Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
In developing countries, where health insurance is not a commonly purchased financial instrument, recent debates have revolved around extending health insurance coverage to a wider range of the population, primarily via compulsory insurance schemes. However, these debates rarely consider the competing demands placed on the family budget, which will influence the acceptability of the program by the populace. In this paper, we draw on data from the 2000 income and expenditure survey to examine treatment effects associated with household insurance status, providing a detailed examination of expenditure substitution patterns within South Africa. In agreement with economic theory, the expansion of health insurance coverage via compulsory schemes creates additional burdens for households, which households accommodate via expenditure substitution. The observed variation in the household's ability to accommodate increased expenditure can and should be used in future to assess policy options and in the design of an optimal social health insurance program.
在发展中国家,健康保险并不是一种常见的购买金融工具,最近的争论主要围绕着通过强制保险计划将健康保险覆盖范围扩大到更广泛的人群。然而,这些争论很少考虑到家庭预算所面临的竞争需求,这将影响到民众对该计划的接受程度。在本文中,我们利用 2000 年收入和支出调查的数据,研究了与家庭保险状况相关的治疗效果,详细考察了南非内部的支出替代模式。与经济理论一致,通过强制计划扩大健康保险覆盖范围会给家庭带来额外负担,家庭通过支出替代来承担这些负担。观察到的家庭承担增加支出的能力的变化可以而且应该在未来用于评估政策选择,并设计最佳的社会健康保险计划。