Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 15;77(4):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.041. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity and clinical outcomes for cervical cancer patients treated definitively with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared with non-IMRT treatment.
This prospective cohort study included 452 patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer treated with curative intent (135 IMRT and 317 non-IMRT). Treatment involved external irradiation and brachytherapy, and 85% of patients received concurrent chemotherapy. All IMRT patients underwent an F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT) simulation. A 3-month post-therapy PET was obtained to evaluate treatment response. Toxicity was scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0.
The IMRT and non-IMRT groups had similar stage distribution and histology. For all patients, the post-therapy FDG-PET response correlated with overall recurrence risk (p < 0.0001) and cause-specific survival (p < 0.0001). Post-treatment FDG-PET findings were not significantly different between the IMRT and non-IMRT patients (p = 0.9774). The mean follow-up for all patients alive at the time of last follow-up was 52 months (72 months non-IMRT, 22 months IMRT). At last follow-up, 178 patients (39 IMRT, 139 non-IMRT) had developed a recurrence. The difference in recurrence-free survival between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0738), although the IMRT group showed better overall and cause-specific survivals (p < 0.0001). Of the patients, 62 patients (8 IMRT and 54 non-IMRT) developed Grade 3 or greater bowel or bladder complications, and by cumulative hazard function analysis the risk was significantly less for patients treated with IMRT (p = 0.0351).
Cervical cancer patients treated with FDG-PET/CT-guided IMRT have improved survival and less treatment-related toxicity compared with patients treated with non-IMRT radiotherapy.
本研究旨在评估接受调强放疗(IMRT)与非调强放疗治疗的宫颈癌患者的毒性和临床结局。
本前瞻性队列研究纳入了 452 例接受根治性治疗的新诊断宫颈癌患者(135 例接受 IMRT,317 例接受非 IMRT)。治疗包括外照射和近距离放疗,85%的患者接受同期化疗。所有 IMRT 患者均进行 F-18 氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)模拟。治疗后 3 个月行 PET 检查以评估治疗反应。毒性采用通用不良事件术语标准 3.0 进行评分。
IMRT 组和非 IMRT 组的分期分布和组织学相似。对于所有患者,治疗后 FDG-PET 反应与总体复发风险(p<0.0001)和特定原因生存(p<0.0001)相关。IMRT 组和非 IMRT 组患者治疗后 FDG-PET 结果无显著差异(p=0.9774)。所有存活至末次随访的患者中位随访时间为 52 个月(非 IMRT 组 72 个月,IMRT 组 22 个月)。末次随访时,178 例患者(IMRT 组 39 例,非 IMRT 组 139 例)复发。两组无复发生存率差异无统计学意义(p=0.0738),但 IMRT 组总体生存率和特定原因生存率更好(p<0.0001)。在患者中,62 例(IMRT 组 8 例,非 IMRT 组 54 例)发生 3 级或更高级别的肠或膀胱并发症,累积风险函数分析显示 IMRT 治疗组的风险显著降低(p=0.0351)。
与接受非调强放疗的患者相比,接受 FDG-PET/CT 引导的调强放疗的宫颈癌患者具有更好的生存和更低的治疗相关毒性。