• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过程与共识:不孕不育诊所中的伦理决策——一项定性研究。

Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic--a qualitative study.

机构信息

Division of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, School of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, The Whelan Building, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2009 Nov;35(11):662-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.029793.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2009.029793
PMID:19880701
Abstract

Infertility treatment is a speciality that has attracted considerable attention both from the public and bioethicists. The focus of this attention has mainly been on the dramatic dilemmas created by theses technologies. Relatively little is known, however, about how clinicians approach and resolve ethical issues on an everyday basis. The central aim of this study is to gain insight into these neglected aspects of practice. It was found that, for the clinicians, the process by which ethical decisions were made was of key importance. It will be argued that this focus on the process of decision-making is more than just empty proceduralism but is based on and facilitates certain substantive ethical principles. In conclusion, suggestions as to how ethical decision-making processes can be supported and improved in infertility practice will be made.

摘要

不孕不育治疗是一门专业,它引起了公众和生物伦理学家的极大关注。关注的焦点主要集中在这些技术带来的戏剧性困境上。然而,人们对临床医生如何在日常基础上处理和解决伦理问题知之甚少。本研究的主要目的是深入了解实践中这些被忽视的方面。研究发现,对于临床医生来说,做出伦理决策的过程至关重要。本文将论证,这种对决策过程的关注不仅仅是空洞的程序主义,而是基于并促进了某些实质性的伦理原则。最后,将就如何支持和改进不孕不育治疗中的伦理决策过程提出建议。

相似文献

1
Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic--a qualitative study.过程与共识:不孕不育诊所中的伦理决策——一项定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Nov;35(11):662-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.029793.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Ethical dilemmas in treating clients with eating disorders: A review and application of an integrative ethical decision-making model.治疗饮食障碍患者的伦理困境:综合伦理决策模型的回顾与应用。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2010 Nov-Dec;18(6):434-52. doi: 10.1002/erv.1036.
4
Medical ethics and ethical dilemmas.医学伦理与伦理困境。
Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):8-16.
5
Informed consent in the Pakistani milieu: the physician's perspective.巴基斯坦环境下的知情同意:医生的视角
J Med Ethics. 2005 Feb;31(2):93-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002220.
6
Ethical decision-making about older adults and moral intensity: an international study of physicians.关于老年人的伦理决策与道德强度:一项针对医生的国际研究。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):285-96. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019273.
7
Attitudes and practices of patients and physicians towards patient autonomy: a survey conducted prior to the enactment of the Patients' Rights Bill in Israel.患者与医生对患者自主权的态度及行为:以色列《患者权利法案》颁布前进行的一项调查。
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2000 Jul;10(4):119-25.
8
Ethical context for physician refusal of requested treatment.医生拒绝所要求治疗的伦理背景。
J Perinatol. 1991 Sep;11(3):273-5.
9
Ethical principles and the rationing of health care: a qualitative study in general practice.伦理原则与医疗保健资源分配:一项全科医疗的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Aug;55(517):620-5.
10
Infertility treatments for gay parents?为同性恋父母提供的不孕治疗?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct;36(5):6.

引用本文的文献

1
Deference or critical engagement: how should healthcare practitioners use clinical ethics guidance?尊重还是批判性参与:医疗保健从业者应该如何使用临床伦理指南?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun;42(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s40592-023-00186-8. Epub 2024 Feb 29.