Thompson B Taylor, Orme James F, Zheng Hui, Luckett Peter M, Truwit Jonathon D, Willson Douglas F, Duncan Hite R, Brower Roy G, Bernard Gordon R, Curley Martha A Q, Steingrub Jay S, Sorenson Dean K, Sward Kathy, Hirshberg Ellie, Morris Alan H
Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 May;2(3):357-68. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200304.
Hyperglycemia during critical illness is common, and intravenous insulin therapy (IIT) to normalize blood glucose improves outcomes in selected populations. Methods differ widely in complexity, insulin dosing approaches, efficacy, and rates of hypoglycemia. We developed a simple bedside-computerized decision support protocol (eProtocol-insulin) that yields promising results in the development center. We examined the effectiveness and safety of this tool in six adult and five pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) in other centers.
We required attending physicians of eligible patients to independently intend to use intravenous insulin to normalize blood glucose. We used eProtocol-insulin for glucose control for a duration determined by the clinical caregivers. Adults had an anticipated length of stay of 3 or more days. In pediatric ICUs, we also required support or intended support with mechanical ventilation for greater than 24 hours or with a vasoactive infusion. We recorded all instances in which eProtocol-insulin instructions were not accepted and all blood glucose values. An independent data safety and monitoring board monitored study results and subject safety. Bedside nurses were selected randomly to complete a paper survey describing their perceptions of quality of care and workload related to eProtocol-insulin use.
Clinicians accepted 93% of eProtocol-insulin instructions (11,773/12,645) in 100 adult and 48 pediatric subjects. Forty-eight percent of glucose values were in the target range. Both of these results met a priori-defined efficacy thresholds. Only 0.18% of glucose values were < or =40 mg/dl. This is lower than values reported in prior IIT studies. Although nurses reported eProtocol-insulin required as much work as managing a mechanical ventilator, most nurses felt eProtocol-insulin had a low impact on their ability to complete non-IIT nursing activities.
A multicenter validation demonstrated that eProtocol-insulin is a valid, exportable tool that can assist clinicians in achieving control of glucose in critically ill adults and children.
危重病期间高血糖很常见,静脉胰岛素治疗(IIT)使血糖正常化可改善特定人群的预后。方法在复杂性、胰岛素给药方法、疗效和低血糖发生率方面差异很大。我们开发了一种简单的床边计算机化决策支持方案(电子胰岛素方案),在研发中心取得了有前景的结果。我们在其他中心的6个成人和5个儿科重症监护病房(ICU)检验了该工具的有效性和安全性。
我们要求符合条件患者的主治医生独立打算使用静脉胰岛素使血糖正常化。我们使用电子胰岛素方案进行血糖控制,持续时间由临床护理人员确定。成人预期住院时间为3天或更长。在儿科ICU,我们还要求有机械通气支持或预期支持超过24小时或有血管活性药物输注。我们记录了所有不接受电子胰岛素方案指令的情况以及所有血糖值。一个独立的数据安全和监测委员会监测研究结果和受试者安全。随机选择床边护士完成一份纸质调查问卷,描述他们对与使用电子胰岛素方案相关的护理质量和工作量的看法。
在100名成人和48名儿科受试者中,临床医生接受了电子胰岛素方案指令的93%(11,773/12,645)。48%的血糖值在目标范围内。这两个结果均达到了预先定义的疗效阈值。只有0.18%的血糖值≤40mg/dl。这低于先前IIT研究报告的值。尽管护士报告电子胰岛素方案所需工作量与管理机械通气一样多,但大多数护士认为电子胰岛素方案对他们完成非IIT护理活动的能力影响较小。
多中心验证表明,电子胰岛素方案是一种有效的、可推广的工具,可帮助临床医生实现对危重病成人和儿童血糖的控制。