Suppr超能文献

电子决策支持系统在多中心儿科重症监护病房临床试验中的治疗干预作用:心脏和肺部衰竭-儿科胰岛素滴定试验 (HALF-PINT)。

Performance of an Electronic Decision Support System as a Therapeutic Intervention During a Multicenter PICU Clinical Trial: Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT).

机构信息

Pulmonary Division, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT; Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; Pediatric Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Critical Care, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Chest. 2021 Sep;160(3):919-928. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.049. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of electronic clinical decision support (CDS) systems for pediatric critical care trials is rare. We sought to describe in detail the use of a CDS tool (Children's Hospital Euglycemia for Kids Spreadsheet [CHECKS]), for the management of hyperglycemia during the 32 multicenter Heart And Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In critically ill pediatric patients who were treated with CHECKS, how was user compliance associated with outcomes; and what patient and clinician factors might account for the observed differences in CHECKS compliance?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

During an observational retrospective study of compliance with a CDS tool used during a prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared patients with high and low CHECKS compliance. We investigated the association between compliance and blood glucose metrics. We describe CHECKS and use a computer interface analysis framework (the user, function, representation, and task analysis framework) to categorize user interactions. We discuss implications for future randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Over a 4.5-year period, 658 of 698 children were treated with the CHECKS protocol for ≥24 hours with a median of 119 recommendations per patient. Compliance per patient was high (median, 99.5%), with only 30 patients having low compliance (<90%). Patients with low compliance were from 16 of 32 sites, younger (P = .02), and less likely to be on inotropic support (P = .04). They were more likely to be have been assigned randomly to the lower blood glucose target (80% vs 48%; P < .001) and to have spent a shorter time (53% vs 75%; P < .001) at the blood glucose target. Overrides (classified by the user, function, representation, and task analysis framework), were largely (89%) due to the user with patient factors contributing 29% of the time.

INTERPRETATION

The use of CHECKS for the Heart And Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration trial resulted in a highly reproducible and explicit method for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill children across varied environments. CDS systems represent an important mechanism for conducting explicit complex pediatric critical care trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01565941, registered March 29 2012; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01565941?term=HALF-PINT&draw=2&rank=1.

摘要

背景

在儿科重症监护试验中使用电子临床决策支持 (CDS) 系统的情况很少见。我们试图详细描述使用 CDS 工具(儿童医院血糖正常化电子表格 [CHECKS])管理 32 项多中心心脏和肺部衰竭儿科胰岛素滴定试验期间的高血糖情况。

研究问题

在接受 CHECKS 治疗的危重症儿科患者中,用户的依从性与结果之间有何关联;哪些患者和临床医生的因素可能导致 CHECKS 依从性的差异?

研究设计和方法

在对前瞻性随机对照试验中使用的 CDS 工具进行观察性回顾性研究期间,我们比较了高和低 CHECKS 依从性患者的情况。我们调查了依从性与血糖指标之间的关联。我们描述了 CHECKS,并使用计算机界面分析框架(用户、功能、表示和任务分析框架)对用户交互进行分类。我们讨论了对未来随机对照试验的影响。

结果

在 4.5 年期间,698 名儿童中有 658 名接受了至少 24 小时的 CHECKS 方案治疗,每位患者的中位数为 119 条建议。每位患者的依从性都很高(中位数,99.5%),只有 30 名患者的依从性较低(<90%)。依从性低的患者来自 32 个地点中的 16 个,年龄较小(P =.02),接受正性肌力支持的可能性较低(P =.04)。他们更有可能被随机分配到较低的血糖目标(80%比 48%;P <.001),并且在血糖目标范围内的时间更短(53%比 75%;P <.001)。(根据用户、功能、表示和任务分析框架进行分类的),覆盖范围主要是由于用户(占 89%),而患者因素占 29%。

解释

在 Heart And Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration 试验中使用 CHECKS 导致了一种在不同环境下管理危重症儿童高血糖的高度可重复和明确方法。CDS 系统代表了进行明确的复杂儿科重症监护试验的重要机制。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01565941,2012 年 3 月 29 日注册;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01565941?term=HALF-PINT&draw=2&rank=1。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c6/8449010/4d37374007c5/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验