• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Balb/c、c57 和 CD-1 小鼠在新异开阔空间测试中的焦虑反应。

Anxiety responses in Balb/c, c57 and CD-1 mice exposed to a novel open space test.

机构信息

University of Sunderland, Sunderland Pharmacy School, Wharncliffe Street, Sunderland SR1 3SD, UK.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 2010 Mar 5;207(2):402-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.028. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.028
PMID:19900487
Abstract

In the present report we describe the behavior of two albinos (BALB/c and CD-1) and one pigmented (c57/BL6) strains of mice exposed to a novel open space anxiety test in a single 12 min session. The test is based on exposure of mice to an unfamiliar elevated platform which is extended on two opposite sides with steep slopes presented downward or upward. In the first experiment, the behavior of mice was examined on the elevated platform at two different heights (75 and 100 cm) with downward slopes. In the second experiment, we examined the behavior of mice on the platform at the lowest height (75 cm) but with upward slopes which lead to a stand. In the third experiment, we examined the behavior of Balb/c mice on the platform at the lowest height (75 cm) with downward slopes, and a hub enclosure providing a protected space located in the centre of the platform. The least anxious strain of mice was expected to take risks and cross onto the slopes (experiments 1 and 3) and onto the stands (experiment 2). The results of experiment 1 show that Balb/c mice did not cross onto the slope, and CD-1 mice made more crossings into and spent more time on the slopes than c57 mice. The increase in the heights of the platform reduced the number of crossings on the platform in all three strains of mice, and decreased the time spent on the platform before first entry onto a slope in c57 and in CD-1 mice. It also decreased the number of entries and duration of entries onto the slopes in CD-1 mice. In experiment 2, Balb/c mice did cross onto the upward slopes but significantly less than c57 and CD-1 mice but they did not cross onto the stands attached to the end of the slopes. CD-1 mice made more entries onto and spent more time on the stands than c57 mice. In the third experiment, Balb/c and c57 mice spent most of their time inside a protective space (cylinder) placed in the centre of the platform demonstrating strong avoidance responses of the outer area of the platform, and only three c57 mice crossed onto the slopes for a very brief duration in one or two entries. In all three experiments, mice entered more frequently and spent more time in the outer areas than in the inner areas of the platform, particularly in the areas adjacent to slopes than in the areas adjacent to a void space. CD-1 mice appears the least anxious taking more risks by venturing onto the slopes and onto the stands while Balb/c appears the most anxious spending a large amount of time in the areas adjacent to the slopes. The different configurations of the test apparatus (experiments 1 and 2) seem to provide different incentives for the drive to explore and escape which may account for differences in anxiety responses whereas the presence of a protective space (experiment 3) appears to encourage avoidance responses.

摘要

在本报告中,我们描述了两种白化(BALB/c 和 CD-1)和一种色素沉着(c57/BL6)品系的小鼠在单次 12 分钟的实验中暴露于一种新的开放式焦虑测试中的行为。该测试基于将小鼠暴露于一个不熟悉的高架平台上,该平台的两个相对侧延伸出陡峭的斜坡,向下或向上倾斜。在第一个实验中,我们在两个不同的高度(75 和 100 cm)的高架平台上检查了小鼠的行为,斜坡向下。在第二个实验中,我们在最低高度(75 cm)的平台上检查了小鼠的行为,但斜坡向上,导致站立。在第三个实验中,我们检查了 Balb/c 小鼠在最低高度(75 cm)的平台上的行为,斜坡向下,以及在平台中心的保护空间的中心提供一个保护空间的中心。预期最不焦虑的品系的小鼠将冒险越过斜坡(实验 1 和 3)和站台(实验 2)。结果显示,实验 1 中的 Balb/c 小鼠没有越过斜坡,而 CD-1 小鼠比 c57 小鼠更多地进入和在斜坡上花费更多的时间。所有三种品系的小鼠的平台高度增加减少了在平台上的穿越次数,并减少了 c57 和 CD-1 小鼠首次进入斜坡前在平台上的时间。它还减少了 CD-1 小鼠进入和在斜坡上的时间。在实验 2 中,Balb/c 小鼠确实越过了向上的斜坡,但明显少于 c57 和 CD-1 小鼠,但它们没有越过斜坡末端的站台。CD-1 小鼠比 c57 小鼠更多地进入和在站台上花费更多的时间。在第三个实验中,Balb/c 和 c57 小鼠大部分时间都在平台中心放置的一个保护空间(圆柱体)内,表现出对平台外部区域的强烈回避反应,只有三只 c57 小鼠在一两个进入中短暂地越过了斜坡。在所有三个实验中,小鼠比平台的内区更频繁地进入并花费更多的时间在外区,特别是在与斜坡相邻的区域比在与空旷空间相邻的区域。CD-1 小鼠似乎最不焦虑,冒险进入斜坡和站台,而 Balb/c 小鼠似乎最焦虑,在与斜坡相邻的区域花费大量时间。测试设备的不同配置(实验 1 和 2)似乎为探索和逃避的驱动力提供了不同的激励,这可能解释了焦虑反应的差异,而保护空间的存在(实验 3)似乎鼓励了回避反应。

相似文献

1
Anxiety responses in Balb/c, c57 and CD-1 mice exposed to a novel open space test.Balb/c、c57 和 CD-1 小鼠在新异开阔空间测试中的焦虑反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Mar 5;207(2):402-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.028. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
2
Models of anxiety: responses of mice to novelty and open spaces in a 3D maze.焦虑模型:小鼠在三维迷宫中对新事物和开放空间的反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Nov 1;174(1):9-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
3
Tolerance, sensitization and dependence to diazepam in Balb/c mice exposed to a novel open space anxiety test.在暴露于新的开放式空间焦虑测试的 Balb/c 小鼠中,地西泮的耐受性、致敏性和依赖性。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 May 1;209(1):154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.039. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
4
Open space anxiety test in rodents: the elevated platform with steep slopes.
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;829:177-91. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_11.
5
Distinguishing anxiolysis and hyperactivity in an open space behavioral test.在开放空间行为测试中区分焦虑缓解和过度活跃。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Feb 11;207(1):84-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.09.042. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
6
Slope climbing challenges, fear of heights, anxiety and time of the day.
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jan 1;316:169-182. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
7
Do rats really express neophobia towards novel objects? Experimental evidence from exposure to novelty and to an object recognition task in an open space and an enclosed space.大鼠真的会对新物体表现出新奇恐惧吗?来自在开放空间和封闭空间中接触新事物及进行物体识别任务的实验证据。
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Feb 11;197(2):417-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
8
Are benzodiazepines really anxiolytic? Evidence from a 3D maze spatial navigation task.苯二氮䓬类药物真的具有抗焦虑作用吗?来自三维迷宫空间导航任务的证据。
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Mar 17;188(1):136-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.10.026. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
9
Models of anxiety: responses of rats to novelty in an open space and an enclosed space.焦虑模型:大鼠在开放空间和封闭空间中对新事物的反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jul 15;171(1):26-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 May 4.
10
Simultaneous assessment of autonomic function and anxiety-related behavior in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice.同时评估BALB/c和C57BL/6小鼠的自主神经功能和焦虑相关行为。
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Feb 27;177(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.025. Epub 2007 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Lack of evidence for a consistent differential impact of tail and tunnel handling on markers of welfare in laboratory mice.缺乏证据表明尾部和隧道处理对实验室小鼠福利指标存在一致的差异影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07384-w.
2
The effects of handling on mouse behavior: cupped hands versus familiar or novel huts or tunnels.处理对小鼠行为的影响:捧在手中与熟悉或新颖的小屋或隧道。
PLoS One. 2025 May 19;20(5):e0323785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323785. eCollection 2025.
3
Beyond fur color: differences in socio-emotional behavior and the oxytocin system between male BL6 and CD1 mice in adolescence and adulthood.
超越毛色:青春期和成年期雄性C57BL/6小鼠与CD1小鼠在社会情感行为和催产素系统方面的差异
Front Neurosci. 2024 Dec 9;18:1493619. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1493619. eCollection 2024.
4
Nature and nurture: Comparing mouse behavior in classic versus revised anxiety-like and social behavioral assays in genetically or environmentally defined groups.先天与后天:在遗传或环境定义的群体中,比较经典与修订后的焦虑样和社交行为测定中,小鼠行为的差异。
Genes Brain Behav. 2023 Dec;22(6):e12869. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12869. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
5
Development of Comorbid Depression after Social Fear Conditioning in Mice and Its Effects on Brain Sphingolipid Metabolism.社交恐惧条件反射后小鼠共病性抑郁的发展及其对大脑神经鞘脂代谢的影响。
Cells. 2023 May 10;12(10):1355. doi: 10.3390/cells12101355.
6
Preference of Escaped Mice for Live Capture or Glue Traps and Relevance to Pest Control Programs.逃脱老鼠对活捕或胶饵陷阱的偏好及其与害虫防治计划的相关性。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 1;62(1):38-47. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000073.
7
Impact of Refinements to Handling and Restraint Methods in Mice.小鼠处理和约束方法改进的影响
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;12(17):2173. doi: 10.3390/ani12172173.
8
Assessment of Binge-Like Eating of Unsweetened vs. Sweetened Chow Pellets in BALB/c Substrains.BALB/c亚系中无糖与含糖饲料颗粒的暴饮暴食样进食评估。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 15;16:944890. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.944890. eCollection 2022.
9
Physiologic and Behavioral Effects in Mice Anesthetized with Isoflurane in a Red-tinted or a Traditional Translucent Chamber.异氟烷麻醉下红色或传统半透明室中老鼠的生理和行为效应。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Jul 1;61(4):322-332. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000011. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
10
Assessing negative affect in mice during abstinence from alcohol drinking: Limitations and future challenges.评估酒精戒断期间小鼠的负性情绪:局限性和未来挑战。
Alcohol. 2022 May;100:41-56. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 15.