Deunk Jaap, Brink Monique, Dekker Helena M, Kool Digna R, Blickman Johan G, van Vugt Arie B, Edwards Michael J
Department of Surgery and Trauma, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Trauma. 2009 Nov;67(5):1080-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318189371d.
This study was performed to determine the agreement between and within surgeons concerning the influence on treatment plan of routine versus selective multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) findings in blunt trauma patients.
For this study, 50 patients were randomly selected from a customized database that was originally used to compare a diagnostic algorithm with a selective use of MDCT with an algorithm with routine MDCT of the spine, chest, and abdomen within the same population. In all 50 patients, routine MDCT found additional diagnoses as compared with the selective MDCT algorithm. Of all patients, paper cases were created with detailed information on clinical parameters, findings by physical examination, and radiologic findings. The cases were independently presented to three different trauma surgeons. First, the surgeons were asked for their treatment plan based upon diagnoses found by physical examination, conventional radiography, and selective MDCT alone. Subsequently they were asked for their treatment plan with knowledge of the injuries additionally found by routine MDCT. This procedure was repeated after 3 months. The agreement between and within surgeons was determined for the change of patient management because of additional findings by routine MDCT.
The agreement on the influence of routine MDCT findings on patient management between surgeons was moderate ([kappa] = 0.46) in the first procedure and substantial in the second ([kappa] = 0.67). The agreement within surgeons ranged from moderate ([kappa] = 0.60) to excellent ([kappa] = 0.87).
All surgeons agreed that the traumatic injuries additionally found by routine MDCT, frequently resulted in a change of treatment plan. There was a moderate-to-excellent agreement between and within surgeons that these additional findings resulted in a change of treatment plan.
本研究旨在确定外科医生之间以及外科医生自身对于常规与选择性多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)检查结果对钝性创伤患者治疗方案影响的一致性。
在本研究中,从一个定制数据库中随机选取了50名患者,该数据库最初用于比较在同一人群中脊柱、胸部和腹部采用选择性MDCT的诊断算法与常规MDCT诊断算法。在所有50名患者中,与选择性MDCT算法相比,常规MDCT发现了更多诊断结果。为所有患者创建了纸质病例,其中包含临床参数、体格检查结果和影像学检查结果的详细信息。这些病例被独立呈现给三位不同的创伤外科医生。首先,要求外科医生仅根据体格检查、传统X线摄影和选择性MDCT所发现的诊断结果制定治疗方案。随后,在知晓常规MDCT额外发现的损伤后,再要求他们制定治疗方案。3个月后重复此过程。针对因常规MDCT的额外发现而导致的患者管理变化,确定了外科医生之间以及外科医生自身的一致性。
在第一个过程中,外科医生之间对于常规MDCT检查结果对患者管理影响的一致性为中等(κ = 0.46),在第二个过程中为高度一致(κ = 0.67)。外科医生自身的一致性范围从中等(κ = 0.60)到优秀(κ = 0.87)。
所有外科医生均认同常规MDCT额外发现的创伤性损伤常常会导致治疗方案的改变。外科医生之间以及外科医生自身对于这些额外发现会导致治疗方案改变这一点存在中等至高度的一致性。