Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-3550, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(3):441-51. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2053-5. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Training-induced improvements on perceptual skills can be attributed to at least two learning types: learning of general aspects of the trained condition (conceptual learning) and learning of specific feature values of the stimulus used in training (stimulus learning). Here we asked whether conceptual and stimulus learning on interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination emerge along different time courses. Conceptual learning was clearly evident 10 h after training, when performance on a target ITD condition was equivalent following training on that condition or on a non-target condition differing only in the stimulus, and was better in both cases than immediately after training. In contrast, stimulus learning emerged 24 h after training. At that time, performance on the target ITD condition was better following target- than non-target training, due to a worsening in performance between 10 and 24 h after non-target training rather than from additional improvements over this time period after target training. Training amount influenced performance immediately, but not 10 or 24 h, after training. Thus, conceptual learning emerged before stimulus learning, and each manifested through different improvement trajectories many hours after training. These results suggest that on ITD discrimination, conceptual learning is consolidated earlier, and with different behavioral consequences, than stimulus learning.
对训练条件的一般方面的学习(概念学习)和对训练中使用的刺激的特定特征值的学习(刺激学习)。在这里,我们询问了在听觉时间差(ITD)辨别方面的概念学习和刺激学习是否沿着不同的时间进程出现。概念学习在训练后 10 小时就明显出现,此时在目标 ITD 条件下的表现与在该条件下或仅在刺激上有所不同的非目标条件下的训练相同,而且在两种情况下都优于训练后立即进行的表现。相比之下,刺激学习在训练后 24 小时出现。在那时,目标 ITD 条件下的表现优于非目标训练,这是由于在非目标训练后的 10 到 24 小时之间的表现恶化,而不是由于在目标训练后这段时间内的额外提高。训练量立即影响表现,但在训练后 10 或 24 小时内没有影响。因此,概念学习比刺激学习更早出现,并且在训练后数小时内表现出不同的改进轨迹。这些结果表明,在 ITD 辨别方面,概念学习比刺激学习更早巩固,并且具有不同的行为后果。