• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于有生育力降低因素病史的异位妊娠患者的最佳治疗方法。

Optimal treatment for patients with ectopic pregnancies and a history of fertility-reducing factors.

机构信息

Women's University Hospital, Tübingen University, Calwerstrasse 7, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jan;283(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1270-2. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-009-1270-2
PMID:19902231
Abstract

PURPOSE

With most ectopic pregnancy (EP) cases now diagnosed and treated early, a major concern has become future reproductive outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term reproductive outcome after salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in patients with and without additional fertility-reducing factors.

METHODS

As part of a prospective follow-up study, 261 patients underwent laparoscopic management of EP at our institution. History was taken specifically looking at preexisting risk factors for reduced fertility. Patients were then followed with regard to future reproductive events.

RESULTS

Of 261 patients, 196 (75%) reported a subsequent desire for pregnancy. 145 patients had undergone salpingotomy and 51 salpingectomy. In patients without prior history of fertility-reducing factors, the subsequent intrauterine pregnancy rates were >90% for both salpingotomy and salpingectomy groups irrespective of the surgical approach. In patients with preexisting fertility-reducing factors, postoperative intrauterine pregnancy rates were 75% in the salpingotomy group, but only 40% in the salpingectomy group (p < 0.05), showing maximal effect for conservative surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic salpingotomy is of particular benefit for patients with additional fertility-reducing factors desirous of future pregnancy. Reproductive outcome is excellent in patients without such risk factor, irrespective of the surgical approach.

摘要

目的

随着大多数异位妊娠(EP)病例的早期诊断和治疗,人们主要关注的是未来的生殖结局。本研究旨在评估有或无其他降低生育能力因素的患者行输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术的长期生殖结局。

方法

作为前瞻性随访研究的一部分,我院对 261 例 EP 患者进行了腹腔镜治疗。专门采集病史以了解是否存在降低生育能力的既往风险因素。然后,患者的未来生殖事件进行了随访。

结果

261 例患者中,196 例(75%)报告有后续妊娠需求。145 例行输卵管切开术,51 例行输卵管切除术。在无既往降低生育能力因素的患者中,无论手术方式如何,输卵管切开术和输卵管切除术组的术后宫内妊娠率均>90%。在存在降低生育能力的既往因素的患者中,输卵管切开术组的术后宫内妊娠率为 75%,而输卵管切除术组仅为 40%(p<0.05),表明保守手术效果最佳。

结论

对于有进一步生育能力降低因素且希望未来妊娠的患者,腹腔镜输卵管切开术特别有益。无此类风险因素的患者,无论手术方式如何,生殖结局均良好。

相似文献

1
Optimal treatment for patients with ectopic pregnancies and a history of fertility-reducing factors.对于有生育力降低因素病史的异位妊娠患者的最佳治疗方法。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jan;283(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1270-2. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
2
Reproductive outcome after methotrexate treatment of tubal pregnancies.甲氨蝶呤治疗输卵管妊娠后的生殖结局。
Fertil Steril. 2004 Aug;82(2):304-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.023.
3
Ectopic pregnancy in Jos Northern Nigeria: prevalence and impact on subsequent fertility.尼日利亚北部乔斯的异位妊娠:患病率及其对后续生育能力的影响。
Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):35-8.
4
Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer?输卵管妊娠行输卵管切开术或切除术:女性更倾向于哪种术式?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
5
Reproductive outcome after multiple ectopic pregnancies.多次异位妊娠后的生殖结局。
Int J Fertil. 1989 Mar-Apr;34(2):102-5.
6
Factors affecting fertility following radical versus conservative surgical treatment for tubal pregnancy.输卵管妊娠根治性手术与保守性手术治疗后影响生育能力的因素。
Saudi Med J. 2001 Apr;22(4):337-41.
7
Conservative surgical treatment of tubal pregnancy: factors affecting future fertility.输卵管妊娠的保守性手术治疗:影响未来生育能力的因素
Int J Fertil. 1986 Jul-Aug;31(3):187-92.
8
[Fertility after ectopic pregnancy and indications of ART].[宫外孕后的生育能力及辅助生殖技术的指征]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2003 Nov;32(7 Suppl):S83-92.
9
A comparative case-controlled study of laparoscopic vs laparotomy management of ectopic pregnancy: an evaluation of reproductive performance after radical vs conservative treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗异位妊娠的比较病例对照研究:输卵管异位妊娠根治性与保守性治疗后生殖性能评估
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Mar;23(2):189-90. doi: 10.1080/0144361031000074781.
10
Fertility outcomes following expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancy.输卵管异位妊娠期待治疗后的生育结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;30(7):988-93. doi: 10.1002/uog.5186.

引用本文的文献

1
Double Trouble: A Case Report of Bilateral Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy After Intrauterine Insemination Along With a Literature Review.双重麻烦:一例宫内人工授精后双侧输卵管异位妊娠的病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 19;17(2):e79294. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79294. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Partial Molar Ectopic Pregnancy: A diagnostic challenge.部分性胎块异位妊娠:诊断难题。
BMJ Case Rep. 2024 Apr 30;17(4):e255432. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-255432.
3
Disseminated ectopic pregnancy after salpingotomy in a 30-year-old patient.一名30岁患者在输卵管切开术后发生了播散性异位妊娠。
Clin Case Rep. 2023 Apr 14;11(4):e7160. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7160. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Comparisons of Fertility Outcomes Following a Salpingectomy and a Salpingotomy with or Without Suturing for a Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.输卵管切除术与输卵管切开术(有无缝合)治疗输卵管异位妊娠后的生育结局比较
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Aug 4;14:1007-1013. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S367948. eCollection 2022.
5
Spontaneous Bilateral Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: Incidental Finding During Laparoscopy - Brief Report and Review of Literature.自发性双侧输卵管异位妊娠:腹腔镜检查时的意外发现——简要报告及文献综述
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Apr;76(4):413-416. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-110394.
6
Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.输卵管妊娠女性行输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术的生育结局比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 25;11(3):e0152343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152343. eCollection 2016.
7
Fertility outcome analysis after surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.输卵管异位妊娠手术治疗后的生育结局分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 8;5(9):e007339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007339.