• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输卵管切除术与输卵管切开术(有无缝合)治疗输卵管异位妊娠后的生育结局比较

Comparisons of Fertility Outcomes Following a Salpingectomy and a Salpingotomy with or Without Suturing for a Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.

作者信息

Zhang Lei, Zhao Jun, Bai Yun, Liu Xiuping

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang City, 050051, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2022 Aug 4;14:1007-1013. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S367948. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S367948
PMID:35959200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9359707/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare fertility outcomes in patients who underwent different laparoscopic surgeries and to determine the most beneficial surgical treatment for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) patients who wished to become pregnant in the future.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients aged 18-36 years, who had been diagnosed with a tubal EP in our hospital, were enrolled. Based on the treatment methods, the patients were divided into three groups, ie a salpingectomy group, a salpingotomy with suturing group and a salpingotomy without suturing group. The follow-up time for the enrolled patients was more than three years. Serum beta (β)-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) levels were monitored after surgery. The intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) rate at 12, 24 and 36 months postoperatively, and recurrent EP rate were compared.

RESULTS

The median time for β-HCG level returning to normal in the salpingectomy group was much shorter than in the salpingotomy with suturing or salpingotomy without suturing groups (P < 0.001). The 12, 24 and 36-month IUP rates among the three groups were not significantly different. A recurrent EP was found in only one patient in the salpingotomy with suturing group and two patients in the salpingotomy without suturing group.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that salpingectomy and salpingotomy with or without suturing methods reflected no significant differences in fertility outcomes for tubal EP patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较接受不同腹腔镜手术的患者的生育结局,并确定对未来希望怀孕的输卵管异位妊娠(EP)患者最有益的手术治疗方法。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了在我院被诊断为输卵管EP的18至36岁患者。根据治疗方法,将患者分为三组,即输卵管切除术组、缝合输卵管切开术组和非缝合输卵管切开术组。纳入患者的随访时间超过三年。术后监测血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)水平。比较术后12、24和36个月的宫内妊娠(IUP)率和复发性EP率。

结果

输卵管切除术组β-HCG水平恢复正常的中位时间比缝合输卵管切开术组或非缝合输卵管切开术组短得多(P<0.001)。三组的12、24和36个月IUP率无显著差异。缝合输卵管切开术组仅1例患者发生复发性EP,非缝合输卵管切开术组有2例患者发生复发性EP。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现输卵管切除术和缝合或不缝合的输卵管切开术方法在输卵管EP患者的生育结局方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c3/9359707/495656bc1bed/IJWH-14-1007-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c3/9359707/495656bc1bed/IJWH-14-1007-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c3/9359707/495656bc1bed/IJWH-14-1007-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparisons of Fertility Outcomes Following a Salpingectomy and a Salpingotomy with or Without Suturing for a Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.输卵管切除术与输卵管切开术(有无缝合)治疗输卵管异位妊娠后的生育结局比较
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Aug 4;14:1007-1013. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S367948. eCollection 2022.
2
Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy.采用输卵管切开术(伴或不伴输卵管缝合)及输卵管切除术治疗输卵管异位妊娠。
Fertil Steril. 1991 Jan;55(1):53-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54058-8.
3
Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study of 95 patients.腹腔镜输卵管切除术或输卵管切开术治疗输卵管妊娠的生育结局:95 例回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.058. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
4
[Salpingotomy vs salpingectomy--a comparison of women's fertility after surgical treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy during a 24-month follow-up study].输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术——一项关于输卵管异位妊娠手术治疗后女性生育能力的24个月随访研究比较
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Dec;84(12):1030-5. doi: 10.17772/gp/1675.
5
Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.输卵管妊娠女性行输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术的生育结局比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 25;11(3):e0152343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152343. eCollection 2016.
6
Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer?输卵管妊娠行输卵管切开术或切除术:女性更倾向于哪种术式?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
7
Endometriosis and Beta-hCG > 775 IU/l Increase the Risk of Non-tube-preserving Surgery for Tubal Pregnancy.子宫内膜异位症和β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素>775IU/l会增加输卵管妊娠非保留输卵管手术的风险。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Jul;78(7):690-696. doi: 10.1055/a-0635-8453. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
8
Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.输卵管妊娠患者行输卵管切开术与切除术的疗效比较(ESEP 研究):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1483-1489. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
9
Fertility outcome analysis after surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.输卵管异位妊娠手术治疗后的生育结局分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 8;5(9):e007339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007339.
10
[Laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy: comparison of linear salpingotomy with and without suturing].[腹腔镜输卵管切开术治疗输卵管妊娠:缝合与未缝合的线性输卵管切开术比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Aug 9;96(30):2424-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.30.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: From Diagnosis to Treatment.输卵管异位妊娠:从诊断到治疗
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 13;13(6):1465. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061465.

本文引用的文献

1
Using dynein heavy chain 5 and creatine kinase levels in cervical fluid and blood for early diagnosing of ectopic pregnancy.利用宫颈液和血液中的动力蛋白重链5及肌酸激酶水平进行异位妊娠的早期诊断。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Mar;47(3):921-927. doi: 10.1111/jog.14616. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Ectopic Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Management.宫外孕:诊断与处理。
Am Fam Physician. 2020 May 15;101(10):599-606.
3
The role of microRNAs in ectopic pregnancy: A concise review.微小RNA在异位妊娠中的作用:简要综述
Noncoding RNA Res. 2020 Apr 18;5(2):67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2020.04.002. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
A Rare Case of Bilateral Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-Embryo Transfer (ICSI-ET).经胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植(ICSI-ET)后双侧输卵管妊娠的罕见病例。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Mar;42(3):165-168. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708093. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
5
Predictive values of the ratio of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin for failure of salpingostomy in ectopic pregnancy.β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素比值对异位妊娠输卵管造口术失败的预测价值。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019 Mar 1;12(3):901-908. eCollection 2019.
6
Laparoscopic Management of 42 Cases of Tubal Stump Pregnancy and Postoperative Reproductive Outcomes.腹腔镜治疗输卵管残端妊娠 42 例及术后生殖结局。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):618-624. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.030. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
Methotrexate Therapy for Ectopic Pregnancies: A Tertiary Center Experience.甲氨蝶呤治疗异位妊娠:三级医疗中心经验
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Nov;40(11):680-685. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675807. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study of 95 patients.腹腔镜输卵管切除术或输卵管切开术治疗输卵管妊娠的生育结局:95 例回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.058. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
9
[Laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy: comparison of linear salpingotomy with and without suturing].[腹腔镜输卵管切开术治疗输卵管妊娠:缝合与未缝合的线性输卵管切开术比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Aug 9;96(30):2424-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.30.012.
10
Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.输卵管妊娠女性行输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术的生育结局比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 25;11(3):e0152343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152343. eCollection 2016.