Dang C V, Barrett J, Villa-Garcia M, Resar L M, Kato G J, Fearon E R
Hematology Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):954-62. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.954-962.1991.
The physiological significance of in vitro leucine zipper interactions was studied by the use of two strategies which detect specific protein-protein interactions in mammalian cells. Fusion genes were constructed which produce chimeric proteins containing leucine zipper domains from several proteins fused either to the DNA-binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL4 protein or to the transcriptional activation domain of the herpes simplex virus VP16 protein. Previous studies in mammalian cells have demonstrated that a single chimeric polypeptide containing these two domains will activate transcription of a reporter gene present downstream of the GAL4 DNA-binding site. Similarly, if the GAL4 DNA-binding domain of a chimeric protein could be complexed through leucine zipper interactions with the VP16 activation domain of another chimeric protein, then transcriptional activation of the reporter gene would be detected. Using this strategy for detecting leucine zipper interactions, we observed homo-oligomerization between leucine zipper domains of the yeast protein GCN4 and hetero-oligomerization between leucine zipper regions from the mammalian transcriptional regulating proteins c-Jun and c-Fos. In contrast, homo-oligomerization of the leucine zipper domain from c-Myc was not detectable in cells. The inability of the c-Myc leucine zipper to homo-oligomerize strongly in cells was confirmed independently. The second strategy to detect leucine zipper interactions takes advantage of the observation that the addition of nuclear localization sequences to a cytoplasmic protein will allow the cytoplasmic protein to be transported to and retained in the nucleus. Chimeric genes encoding proteins with sequences from a cytoplasmic protein fused either to the GCN4 or c-Myc leucine zipper domains were constructed. Experiments with the c-Myc chimeric protein failed to demonstrate transport of the cytoplasmic marker protein to the nucleus in cells expressing the wild-type c-Myc protein. In contrast, the cytoplasmic marker was translocated into the nucleus when the GCN4 leucine zippers were present on both the cytoplasmic marker and a nuclear protein, presumably as a result of leucine zipper interaction. These results suggest that c-Myc function requires hetero-oligomerization to an as yet undefined factor.
通过两种在哺乳动物细胞中检测特定蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的策略,研究了体外亮氨酸拉链相互作用的生理意义。构建了融合基因,其产生嵌合蛋白,该嵌合蛋白包含来自几种蛋白质的亮氨酸拉链结构域,这些结构域与酿酒酵母GAL4蛋白的DNA结合结构域或单纯疱疹病毒VP16蛋白的转录激活结构域融合。先前在哺乳动物细胞中的研究表明,含有这两个结构域的单个嵌合多肽将激活位于GAL4 DNA结合位点下游的报告基因的转录。同样,如果嵌合蛋白的GAL4 DNA结合结构域能够通过亮氨酸拉链相互作用与另一种嵌合蛋白的VP16激活结构域形成复合物,那么就会检测到报告基因的转录激活。使用这种检测亮氨酸拉链相互作用的策略,我们观察到酵母蛋白GCN4的亮氨酸拉链结构域之间的同型寡聚化以及哺乳动物转录调节蛋白c-Jun和c-Fos的亮氨酸拉链区域之间的异型寡聚化。相比之下,在细胞中未检测到c-Myc的亮氨酸拉链结构域的同型寡聚化。c-Myc亮氨酸拉链在细胞中不能强烈同型寡聚化这一点得到了独立证实。检测亮氨酸拉链相互作用的第二种策略利用了这样的观察结果,即向细胞质蛋白添加核定位序列将使细胞质蛋白转运到细胞核并保留在细胞核中。构建了嵌合基因,其编码的蛋白质具有来自细胞质蛋白的序列,该序列与GCN4或c-Myc亮氨酸拉链结构域融合。对c-Myc嵌合蛋白进行的实验未能证明在表达野生型c-Myc蛋白的细胞中细胞质标记蛋白转运到细胞核。相比之下,当细胞质标记物和核蛋白上都存在GCN4亮氨酸拉链时,细胞质标记物被转运到细胞核中,推测这是亮氨酸拉链相互作用的结果。这些结果表明,c-Myc的功能需要与一个尚未确定的因子进行异型寡聚化。