Suppr超能文献

博利符号在讲塞茨瓦纳语的儿童中的透明性和可学性:探索。

Translucency and learnability of Blissymbols in Setswana-speaking children: an exploration.

机构信息

Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Augment Altern Commun. 2009 Dec;25(4):287-98. doi: 10.3109/07434610903392456.

Abstract

Although the importance of iconicity in the learning of symbols has been widely acknowledged, there have been few systematic investigations into the influence of culture on the ratings of symbol iconicity. The purposes of this study were two-fold: to determine (a) the translucency ratings of specific Blissymbols as rated by 6- to 7-year-old Setswana-speaking children (one of South Africa's 11 official languages); and (b) whether the ratings changed after second and third exposures in order to determine the learnability of these symbols. This study is partially based on the study by Quist et al. (1998), which utilized Dutch and American participants. Thirty-four Setswana children were exposed to 93 selected Blissymbols. A 3-point semantic differential scale consisting of three faces accompanied each Blissymbol, without the written gloss. This procedure was repeated over a period of 3 days. The results indicated that the majority of Blissymbols were rated as having high translucency ratings. The research further demonstrated significant differences in translucency between first and second exposures, suggesting that learning of the symbols had occurred. The comparison between the results of the current study and the results reported in the Quist et al. study reveal that the translucency ratings of the majority of the selected Blissymbols ranged from moderate to high for all three studies, but that the distribution of symbols across the ratings appears to be different.

摘要

虽然象似性在符号学习中的重要性已得到广泛认可,但对于文化对符号象似性评价的影响,却鲜有系统的研究。本研究旨在探究以下两个问题:(a)6-7 岁说茨瓦纳语(南非 11 种官方语言之一)的儿童对特定 Blissymbols 的透明性评价;以及(b)经过第二和第三次接触后,这些符号的评价是否发生了变化,以确定这些符号的可学性。本研究部分基于 Quist 等人(1998 年)的研究,该研究使用了荷兰和美国的参与者。34 名茨瓦纳儿童接触了 93 个选定的 Blissymbols。每个 Blissymbol 都附有一个由三张脸组成的 3 点语义差异量表,没有书面注释。这个过程在 3 天内重复进行。结果表明,大多数 Blissymbols 的透明性评价都很高。研究进一步表明,第一次和第二次接触之间的透明性存在显著差异,表明符号的学习已经发生。当前研究的结果与 Quist 等人的研究结果进行比较后发现,在这三项研究中,大多数选定 Blissymbols 的透明性评价均处于中等至高等水平,但符号在评价中的分布似乎有所不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验