Ali Erden, Saso Srdjan, Ashrafian Hutan, Athanasiou Thanos
Department of Biosurgery-Surgical Technology and Surgical Epidemiology Unit, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, QEQM building, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust at St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):293-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.221226. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether skeletonization of the right gastro-epiploic artery (RGEA) improves graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Altogether >25 papers were found using the reported search, of which 11 papers represented the best evidence to answer this clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results are tabulated. Four out of the 11 papers were comparative studies (skeletonized conduits vs. pedicled conduits) and four studies produced one-year follow-up data. No studies revealed long-term patency rates as there was no follow-up data beyond five years. It is important to note that the evidence in the literature is based in a Japanese population. The vast majority of the target vessel which had been grafted by the RGEA was the right coronary artery and more specifically the posterior descending artery (PDA). The association between off-pump technique, sequential grafting, skeletonization of the RGEA with the harmonic scalpel and angiographic patency has not been adequately assessed. The studies reveal excellent patency rates for both early and mid-term skeletonized RGEA conduits. Overall patency rates were 97.7% within three months, 92.4% at a mean of approximately 1 year, 91.5% at a mean of approximately 2 years, and 86.4% at 4 years. In the four comparative studies, skeletonization patency was at least comparable and in one study superior to pedicled conduits. One study revealed a higher four-year cumulative patency rate for skeletonized conduits in comparison to a previous study by the same author where pedicled grafts were used. In conclusion, patency rates exceeded 95% in 10 studies for a follow-up of up to three months postoperatively. The evidence which supports the use of a 'skeletonized' RGEA is growing and this paper demonstrates clearly that in terms of patency, a skeletonized RGEA to the PDA should be considered as a conduit for CABG surgery especially when total arterial revascularization strategy with in situ conduits and no manipulation of the ascending aorta is the treatment of choice.
一篇心脏外科的最佳证据主题文章是按照结构化方案撰写的。所探讨的问题是,在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中,游离胃网膜右动脉(RGEA)是否能提高移植血管通畅率。通过报告的检索共找到25篇以上的论文,其中11篇论文代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。现将作者、期刊、出版日期和国家、研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局和结果制成表格。11篇论文中有4篇是比较研究(游离血管桥与带蒂血管桥),4项研究提供了1年的随访数据。由于没有超过5年的随访数据,没有研究揭示长期通畅率。需要注意的是,文献中的证据基于日本人群。RGEA所移植的绝大多数靶血管是右冠状动脉,更具体地说是后降支动脉(PDA)。非体外循环技术、序贯移植、使用超声刀游离RGEA与血管造影通畅率之间的关联尚未得到充分评估。研究显示,早期和中期游离RGEA血管桥的通畅率都很高。总体通畅率在3个月内为97.7%,平均约1年时为92.4%,平均约2年时为91.5%,4年时为86.4%。在4项比较研究中,游离血管桥的通畅率至少相当,在一项研究中优于带蒂血管桥。一项研究显示,与同一作者之前使用带蒂移植物的研究相比,游离血管桥的4年累积通畅率更高。总之,在10项研究中,术后长达3个月的随访中通畅率超过95%。支持使用“游离”RGEA的证据越来越多,本文清楚地表明,就通畅率而言,尤其是当原位血管桥的全动脉血运重建策略且不操作升主动脉是首选治疗方法时,用于PDA的游离RGEA应被视为CABG手术的血管桥。