• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路移植术后右胃网膜动脉桥的痉挛与再通

Spasm and Reopening of the Right Gastroepiploic Artery Conduit After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

作者信息

Huh Jae-Hak, Lee Kyung-Hak, Cho Kwang Ree, Hwang Ho Young, Kim Ki-Bong

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hanseo Hospital, Busan.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul;104(1):138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.104. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.104
PMID:28017336
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) has advantages for use as an arterial conduit in coronary artery bypass graft surgery but perioperative spasm often develops. This study assessed the spasm and occlusion rates of RGEA conduits and elucidated the mechanism of reopening of occluded RGEA conduits.

METHODS

Patients who received an RGEA conduit in coronary artery bypass graft surgery were studied (n = 976; 700 composite, 276 in situ, 16 free grafts; 16 received both in situ and composite grafts). Early, 1-year, and 5-year angiographies were performed in 961 patients (98.5%), 815 patients (83.5%), and 618 patients (63.3%), respectively.

RESULTS

Graft spasm was demonstrated in early angiograms in 72 proximal graft trunks of 1,608 distal anastomoses (4.5%) constructed using an RGEA conduit. Early occlusion rates of composite, in situ, and free RGEA conduits were 1.1%, 2.5%, and 0%, respectively; 8.5%, 7.5%, and 21.4%, respectively, at 1 year; and 10.5%, 14.1%, and 37.5%, respectively, at 5 years. Nineteen of 23 patients who had RGEA conduit occlusions at early angiography (1 occluded anastomosis per patient) were reevaluated at 1 year, and 9 of them (47.4%) had become patent. Of 83 patients with occluded RGEA composite grafts (90 occluded RGEA conduit anastomoses) at 1-year angiography, 8 were reopened at 5 years (8.9%). Progression of native target coronary artery disease was observed in all 8 patients with reopened occluded RGEA conduits at 5 years but not in 9 patients with reopened RGEA conduits at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Reopening of occluded RGEA conduits occurred early and midterm postoperatively. Reopening appeared related to recovery from graft spasm, and could occur as late as midterm if associated with progression of native coronary artery disease.

摘要

背景

在冠状动脉旁路移植手术中,胃网膜右动脉(RGEA)作为动脉管道使用具有优势,但围手术期常发生痉挛。本研究评估了RGEA管道的痉挛和闭塞率,并阐明了闭塞的RGEA管道重新开放的机制。

方法

对在冠状动脉旁路移植手术中接受RGEA管道的患者进行研究(n = 976;700例复合移植,276例原位移植,16例游离移植;16例接受了原位和复合移植)。分别对961例患者(98.5%)、815例患者(83.5%)和618例患者(63.3%)进行了早期、1年和5年的血管造影。

结果

在使用RGEA管道构建的1608个远端吻合口中,72个近端移植主干在早期血管造影中显示移植痉挛(4.5%)。复合、原位和游离RGEA管道的早期闭塞率分别为1.1%、2.5%和0%;1年时分别为8.5%、7.5%和21.4%;5年时分别为10.5%、14.1%和37.5%。23例在早期血管造影时RGEA管道闭塞的患者(每位患者1个闭塞的吻合口)在1年时进行了重新评估,其中9例(47.4%)已再通。在1年血管造影时83例RGEA复合移植闭塞的患者(90个RGEA管道吻合口闭塞)中,8例在5年时重新开放(8.9%)。5年时,所有8例闭塞的RGEA管道重新开放的患者均观察到自身目标冠状动脉疾病进展,但1年时9例RGEA管道重新开放的患者未观察到。

结论

闭塞的RGEA管道在术后早期和中期重新开放。重新开放似乎与移植痉挛的恢复有关,如果与自身冠状动脉疾病进展相关,可能会迟至中期发生。

相似文献

1
Spasm and Reopening of the Right Gastroepiploic Artery Conduit After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后右胃网膜动脉桥的痉挛与再通
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul;104(1):138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.104. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Does a skeletonized or pedicled right gastro-epiploic artery improve patency when used as a conduit in coronary artery bypass graft surgery?在冠状动脉旁路移植手术中用作血管 conduit 时,骨骼化或带蒂的右胃网膜动脉是否能提高通畅率?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):293-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.221226. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
3
Predictors of early graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic total occlusion.冠状动脉搭桥术治疗慢性完全闭塞病变后早期移植血管失败的预测因素
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;23(1):142-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw084. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
Sequential bypass using the right gastroepiploic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.使用胃网膜右动脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术的序贯搭桥。
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Jul;51(7):277-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02719378.
5
Right gastroepiploic artery versus right internal thoracic artery composite grafts: 10-year patency and long-term outcomes.胃网膜右动脉与右内乳动脉复合移植物:10 年通畅率及长期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;163(4):1333-1343.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.05.096. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
6
Reopening of the occluded saphenous vein composite grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后闭塞的大隐静脉复合移植物再通。
J Card Surg. 2021 Nov;36(11):4061-4067. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15936. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
7
Randomized comparative study of radial artery and right gastroepiploic artery in composite arterial graft for CABG.冠状动脉旁路移植术复合动脉移植物中桡动脉与右胃网膜动脉的随机对照研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Jun;21(6):1009-14. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00180-x.
8
Equivalency of right internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery composite grafts: five-year outcomes.右内乳动脉与胃网膜右动脉复合移植物等效性:5 年结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2061-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
9
The right gastroepiploic artery in coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术中的胃网膜右动脉。
J Card Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):398-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00623.x.
10
Comparison of right internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery Y grafts anastomosed to the left internal thoracic artery.右内乳动脉与胃网膜右动脉 Y 型吻合至左内乳动脉的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):744-50; discussion 751-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.109.