Taube Sheila E
ST-Consulting, Glen Echo, Maryland 20812-0260, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Oct;1180:111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05019.x.
Few apparently promising oncology biomarkers actually make their way into routine clinical use. There are many reasons for this lack of success, and the complexity of cancer biology is only one of the reasons. Challenges involved in evaluating the analytical and the clinical performance of cancer biomarkers account for the lack of successful translation to the clinic. The lack of clear definition of the clinical need often results in tests that may perform reproducibly but are not used because they do not help with important patient care decisions. The National Cancer Institute Cancer Diagnosis Program launched the Program for the Assessment of Clinical Cancer Tests in an effort to move biomarkers more efficiently and effectively into the clinic. A development pathway is proposed that defines the steps required for evaluation of a biomarker assay's analytical and clinical performance. Several pilot projects are ongoing to test the process, and these are described.
很少有看似很有前景的肿瘤生物标志物能真正进入常规临床应用。这种缺乏成功转化的原因有很多,癌症生物学的复杂性只是其中之一。评估癌症生物标志物分析性能和临床性能所涉及的挑战导致其难以成功转化至临床应用。临床需求缺乏明确定义常常导致一些检测虽可重复性地进行,但却未被采用,因为它们无助于做出重要的患者护理决策。美国国立癌症研究所癌症诊断项目启动了临床癌症检测评估项目,旨在更高效且有效地将生物标志物引入临床。文中提出了一条研发路径,明确了评估生物标志物检测分析性能和临床性能所需的步骤。目前正在进行几个试点项目来测试该流程,并对这些项目进行了描述。