Soares Claudio N, Kornstein Susan G, Thase Michael E, Jiang Qin, Guico-Pabia Christine J
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Mood Disorders Division, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3B6, Canada.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;70(10):1365-71. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05133blu.
To evaluate the effects of desvenlafaxine therapy on functioning and well-being in major depressive disorder (MDD).
Total and individual item Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) scores from 8 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week desvenlafaxine clinical trials were pooled. Scores on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS(17)) work/activities and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) lassitude items were pooled from 9 studies. Outpatients with DSM-IV MDD were randomly assigned to fixed (5 studies; 50, 100, 200, or 400 mg/d; n = 1,342) or flexible (4 studies, 100-400 mg/d; n = 463) doses of desvenlafaxine or placebo (n = 1,108). Data from each patient's final evaluation were analyzed for the total population and for individual dose groups from the fixed-dose studies and were compared between groups using analysis of covariance.
Compared with placebo, desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in SDS total score (-2.0) and individual items regarding work (-0.6), social life/leisure activities (-0.8), and family life/home responsibilities (-0.7; P < .001 for all comparisons), as well as WHO-5 total score (1.7) and individual items (good spirits [0.4], calm/relaxed [0.4], active/vigorous [0.3], fresh/rested [0.3], and interest [0.3]; P < .001 for all comparisons). Desvenlafaxine treatment resulted in significant improvements on the HDRS(17) work/activities (-0.2; P < .001) and MADRS lassitude (-0.3; P < .001) items compared with placebo. Significant differences were observed for the individual fixed-dose groups on all outcomes (P < .05); there was no evidence of a dose-response relationship.
Desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significant improvements in the functioning and well-being among MDD patients.
评估去甲文拉法辛治疗对重度抑郁症(MDD)患者功能和幸福感的影响。
汇总了8项双盲、安慰剂对照、为期8周的去甲文拉法辛临床试验中Sheehan功能障碍量表(SDS)总分及各单项得分以及世界卫生组织5项幸福指数(WHO-5)得分。从9项研究中汇总了17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS(17))工作/活动项得分及蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)疲倦项得分。将符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准的门诊MDD患者随机分配至固定剂量组(5项研究;50、100、200或400 mg/d;n = 1342)或灵活剂量组(4项研究,100 - 400 mg/d;n = 463)接受去甲文拉法辛治疗或安慰剂治疗(n = 1108)。对每位患者最终评估的数据进行总体分析,并对固定剂量研究中的各剂量组进行分析,采用协方差分析比较组间差异。
与安慰剂相比,去甲文拉法辛治疗使SDS总分显著改善(-2.0),在工作(-0.6)、社交生活/休闲活动(-0.8)和家庭生活/家庭责任(-0.7;所有比较P <.001)等单项上也有显著改善,WHO-5总分(1.7)及各单项(精神状态良好[0.4]、平静/放松[0.4]、积极/精力充沛[0.3]、神清气爽/休息良好[0.3]和兴趣[0.3];所有比较P <.001)同样显著改善。与安慰剂相比,去甲文拉法辛治疗使HDRS(17)工作/活动项(-0.2;P <.001)和MADRS疲倦项(-0.3;P <..001)显著改善。各固定剂量组在所有结局指标上均有显著差异(P <.05);未发现剂量-反应关系。
去甲文拉法辛治疗使MDD患者的功能和幸福感显著改善。