University of Tsukuba, School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba-City, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan.
Faculty of Contemporary Policy Studies, University of Josai, Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Jan-Feb;33(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
This article describes the recent law reform on forensic mental health and its background in Japan, focusing on the enactment of the Medical Treatment and Supervision Act in 2005. The new system-under which a person who commits a serious criminal offence in a state of insanity or diminished responsibility shall be referred by the public prosecutor to the District Court-aims to provide intensive psychiatric treatment to offenders with mental disorders, attaching great importance to their reintegration into society. The court panel, which consists of a judge and a specially qualified psychiatrist, plays a key role in the treatment procedure. Upon the agreement of the two panel members, the panel delivers a verdict that takes into account the outcome of psychiatric evaluation; possible verdicts are inpatient treatment order, outpatient treatment order (mental health supervision), and no treatment order. Designated facilities are currently being established for inpatient and outpatient treatment. Referring to the published data on outcomes of enforcement, this article discusses particularities, current problems, and future prospects of the system, drawing comparisons between the German and Japanese systems.
本文介绍了日本最近在法医心理健康方面的法律改革及其背景,重点介绍了 2005 年《医疗和监督法》的颁布。新制度规定,检察官应将处于精神错乱或责任减轻状态下犯下严重刑事罪行的人移送地方法院,目的是为有精神障碍的罪犯提供强化精神治疗,非常重视他们重新融入社会。由一名法官和一名特别合格的精神病学家组成的法庭小组在治疗程序中发挥着关键作用。在两名小组成员达成一致的情况下,小组作出考虑到精神评估结果的判决;可能的判决有住院治疗令、门诊治疗令(精神健康监督)和无治疗令。目前正在为住院和门诊治疗设立指定设施。本文参考已发表的执行结果数据,讨论了该制度的特殊性、当前问题和未来前景,并对德国和日本的制度进行了比较。