• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机、双盲试验:比较 250 毫克卡立普多与安慰剂和 350 毫克卡立普多治疗腰部痉挛的疗效。

Randomized, double-blind trial of carisoprodol 250 mg compared with placebo and carisoprodol 350 mg for the treatment of low back spasm.

机构信息

South Florida Clinical Research Center, Hollywood, FL, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):91-9. doi: 10.1185/03007990903382428.

DOI:10.1185/03007990903382428
PMID:19908948
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carisoprodol, a centrally active skeletal muscle relaxant, is widely used for the treatment of acute, painful musculoskeletal disorders. When administered at a dose of 350 mg four times daily, carisoprodol demonstrated significant clinical benefit in its early clinical development trials; however, some unfavorable side effects, such as drowsiness and dizziness, were reported. Recently, research was conducted to determine if a lower dose of carisoprodol would retain efficacy but improve tolerability compared to the higher 350-mg dose.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this multicenter study was to compare the efficacy and safety of carisoprodol 250-mg tablets four times daily to 350-mg tablets four times daily and to placebo in patients with acute, painful musculoskeletal spasm of the lower back.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this 1-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter trial, patients 18 to 65 years of age with moderate to severe back spasm were randomly assigned to treatment with carisoprodol 250-mg tablets (n = 264), 350-mg tablets (n = 273), or matching placebo tablets (n = 269) three times daily and at bedtime.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The coprimary efficacy variables were patient-rated relief from starting backache and patient-rated global impression of change assessed on treatment day 3.

RESULTS

The carisoprodol 250-mg regimen was significantly more effective than placebo as assessed by both patient-rated relief from starting backache (p = 0.0001) and patient-rated global impression of change (p = 0.0046). There were no significant differences between the 250-mg and 350-mg dosages for the coprimary efficacy endpoints, and patients improved with or without sedation. Fewer than 1% of patients in the carisoprodol 250-mg group discontinued prematurely because of treatment-emergent adverse events, and no patient discontinued because of drowsiness.

CONCLUSIONS

When administered three times daily and at bedtime, carisoprodol 250 mg was as effective as 350 mg three times daily and at bedtime with a lower incidence of adverse events and fewer discontinuations of therapy due to adverse events. Patients improved whether or not they reported sedation as an adverse event.

摘要

背景

卡立普多是一种中枢性骨骼肌松弛剂,广泛用于治疗急性、疼痛性肌肉骨骼疾病。在早期临床开发试验中,卡立普多以 350 毫克,每日四次的剂量给药时显示出显著的临床益处;然而,据报道,一些不利的副作用,如嗜睡和头晕。最近,研究旨在确定较低剂量的卡立普多是否会保留疗效,但改善耐受性与较高的 350 毫克剂量相比。

目的

本多中心研究的目的是比较卡立普多 250 毫克片剂,每日四次与 350 毫克片剂,每日四次与安慰剂在治疗急性、疼痛性肌肉骨骼痉挛的下背部的患者中的疗效和安全性。

研究设计和方法

在这项为期 1 周的双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组多中心试验中,年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的中度至重度背部痉挛患者被随机分配接受卡立普多 250 毫克片剂(n = 264)、350 毫克片剂(n = 273)或匹配的安慰剂片剂(n = 269),每日三次和睡前。

主要疗效指标

主要疗效变量是患者报告的开始背痛缓解和患者报告的治疗第 3 天的总体印象变化。

结果

卡立普多 250 毫克治疗方案在患者报告的开始背痛缓解(p = 0.0001)和患者报告的总体印象变化(p = 0.0046)方面均显著优于安慰剂。两种主要疗效终点的 250 毫克和 350 毫克剂量之间没有显著差异,患者无论是否有镇静作用都有改善。卡立普多 250 毫克组中少于 1%的患者因治疗出现的不良事件提前停药,没有患者因嗜睡而停药。

结论

当每日三次和睡前服用时,卡立普多 250 毫克与每日三次和睡前服用 350 毫克一样有效,不良反应发生率较低,因不良反应导致治疗中断的患者较少。无论患者是否报告镇静作为不良反应,患者都有所改善。

相似文献

1
Randomized, double-blind trial of carisoprodol 250 mg compared with placebo and carisoprodol 350 mg for the treatment of low back spasm.随机、双盲试验:比较 250 毫克卡立普多与安慰剂和 350 毫克卡立普多治疗腰部痉挛的疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):91-9. doi: 10.1185/03007990903382428.
2
Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of carisoprodol 250-mg tablets in the treatment of acute lower-back spasm.250毫克卡立普多片剂治疗急性下背部痉挛的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Feb;24(2):551-8. doi: 10.1185/030079908x261014.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of cyclobenzaprine extended release for acute muscle spasm: a pooled analysis.环苯扎林缓释剂治疗急性肌肉痉挛的疗效和耐受性:汇总分析。
Postgrad Med. 2010 Jul;122(4):158-69. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.07.2182.
4
Low-dose cyclobenzaprine versus combination therapy with ibuprofen for acute neck or back pain with muscle spasm: a randomized trial.低剂量环苯扎林与布洛芬联合治疗急性颈部或背部疼痛伴肌肉痉挛的随机试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1485-93. doi: 10.1185/030079905X61938.
5
Efficacy of a low-dose regimen of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride in acute skeletal muscle spasm: results of two placebo-controlled trials.盐酸环苯扎林低剂量方案治疗急性骨骼肌痉挛的疗效:两项安慰剂对照试验的结果
Clin Ther. 2003 Apr;25(4):1056-73. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80067-x.
6
Efficacy and safety of modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study.莫达非尼薄膜包衣片治疗儿童及青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、灵活剂量研究的结果
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e777-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0617.
7
Combination oxycodone 5 mg/ibuprofen 400 mg for the treatment of pain after abdominal or pelvic surgery in women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled parallel-group study.5毫克羟考酮/400毫克布洛芬联合用药治疗女性腹部或盆腔手术后疼痛:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照和活性药物对照的平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jan;27(1):45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.01.010.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of a fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate in the treatment of vertigo: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-group, outpatient study.桂利嗪和茶苯海明固定低剂量组合治疗眩晕的疗效和耐受性:一项为期4周的随机、双盲、活性药物和安慰剂对照、平行组门诊研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):84-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.010.
9
Transdermal buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain: results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.透皮丁丙诺啡治疗慢性疼痛:一项III期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
Clin Ther. 2004 Nov;26(11):1808-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.11.008.
10
Commonly used muscle relaxant therapies for acute low back pain: a review of carisoprodol, cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride, and metaxalone.急性下腰痛常用的肌肉松弛剂疗法:卡立普多、盐酸环苯扎林和美他沙酮的综述
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1355-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Efficacy of Methocarbamol and Nefopam in Orthopedic Surgical Pain.评估美索巴莫和奈福泮在骨科手术疼痛中的疗效。
Cureus. 2024 May 2;16(5):e59533. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59533. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Comparative effectiveness and safety of analgesic medicines for adults with acute non-specific low back pain: systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人急性非特异性下腰痛镇痛药物的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 22;380:e072962. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072962.
3
Carisoprodol Single and Multiple Dose PK-PD. Part II: Pharmacodynamics Evaluation Method for Central Muscle Relaxants. Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial in Healthy Volunteers.
卡立普多单剂量与多剂量的药代动力学-药效学。第二部分:中枢性肌肉松弛剂的药效学评估方法。健康志愿者的双盲安慰剂对照临床试验。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 21;11(4):1141. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041141.
4
Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of muscle relaxants for adults with non-specific low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.肌松剂治疗非特异性下腰痛成人患者的疗效、可接受性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 7;374:n1446. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1446.
5
The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.期刊影响因子、报告冲突及报告资金来源对背痛试验标准化效应量的影响:一项系统评价与Meta回归分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 30;16:370. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0825-6.
6
Bioavailability of oral carisoprodol 250 and 350 mg and metabolism to meprobamate: A single-dose crossover study.口服250毫克和350毫克卡立普多的生物利用度及其向甲丙氨酯的代谢:一项单剂量交叉研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2010 Feb;71(1):50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2010.02.003.