• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受 GnRH 拮抗剂方案的反应不良患者中使用芳香化酶抑制剂。

Use of aromatase inhibitors in poor-responder patients receiving GnRH antagonist protocols.

机构信息

Center for Research on Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Oct;19(4):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.007
PMID:19909587
Abstract

The efficacy of aromatase inhibitors incorporated in the ovarian stimulation protocols of poor-responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycles was investigated. A total of 70 poor-responder patients were randomized into two groups on day 3 of their menstrual cycle. In Group A, an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole, 5 mg/day) was administered along with a fixed dosage (450 IU/day) of recombinant FSH (rFSH), whereas Group B were treated with the same rFSH dosage alone. A flexible regimen of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist was administered in both groups. The mean total dose of rFSH (2980 +/- 435 IU versus 3850 +/- 580 IU, P < 0.05) and serum concentrations of oestradiol on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration (1870 +/- 159 pg/ml versus 2015 +/- 175 pg/ml, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group A compared with Group B, respectively. The rate of cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response was lower in Group A (8.6%) than in Group B (28.6%), ( P < 0.05). The costs of achieving a clinical pregnancy were US$11560 and US$17584, and the clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were 25.8% and 20%, in groups A and B, respectively. In conclusion, adjunctive letrozole administration seems to restore an IVF cycle by decreasing the rate of cycle cancellation and seems to reduce the cost by reducing the total gonadotrophin dosage.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨芳香化酶抑制剂在接受胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植(ICSI-ET)周期的卵巢反应不良患者的卵巢刺激方案中的疗效。共 70 例卵巢反应不良患者于月经周期第 3 天随机分为两组。A 组患者给予芳香化酶抑制剂(来曲唑,5mg/d)联合固定剂量(450IU/d)重组促卵泡激素(rFSH),B 组患者仅给予相同剂量的 rFSH。两组均给予促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的灵活方案。A 组患者的 rFSH 总剂量(2980±435IU 对 3850±580IU,P<0.05)和人绒毛膜促性腺激素给药日的雌二醇血清浓度(1870±159pg/ml 对 2015±175pg/ml,P<0.05)均明显低于 B 组。A 组因卵巢反应不良而取消周期的比例(8.6%)明显低于 B 组(28.6%)(P<0.05)。A 组的临床妊娠率为 25.8%,B 组为 20%,每例胚胎移植的成本分别为 11560 美元和 17584 美元。

结论

来曲唑辅助治疗可降低周期取消率,恢复 IVF 周期,通过减少总促性腺激素剂量来降低成本。

相似文献

1
Use of aromatase inhibitors in poor-responder patients receiving GnRH antagonist protocols.在接受 GnRH 拮抗剂方案的反应不良患者中使用芳香化酶抑制剂。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Oct;19(4):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.007.
2
A randomized single-blind controlled trial of letrozole as a low-cost IVF protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a preliminary report.来曲唑作为低成本体外受精方案用于卵巢反应不良女性的随机单盲对照试验:初步报告
Hum Reprod. 2004 Sep;19(9):2031-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh359. Epub 2004 Jun 24.
3
A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.两种卵巢刺激方案与促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂联合治疗用于体外受精的随机比较,这两种方案分别是在周期第2天或第5天开始使用重组促卵泡激素并与标准长效GnRH激动剂方案进行对比。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jan;88(1):166-73. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020788.
4
The comparision of effect of microdose GnRH-a flare-up, GnRH antagonist/aromatase inhibitor letrozole and GnRH antagonist/clomiphene citrate protocols on IVF outcomes in poor responder patients.小剂量促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)激发方案、GnRH拮抗剂/芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑方案以及GnRH拮抗剂/枸橼酸氯米芬方案对低反应患者体外受精结局影响的比较
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Jul;30(7):485-9. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.893571. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
5
Aromatase inhibitors in ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: a pilot study.芳香化酶抑制剂在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射卵巢刺激中的应用:一项初步研究。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Aug;13(2):166-72. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60611-6.
6
[Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].国产高纯度尿促卵泡素对控制性卵巢刺激中体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;48(11):838-42.
7
An effective alternative to only gonadotrophin for controlled ovarian stimulation in unexplained infertility patients undergoing intra-uterine insemination: a clinical trial.在接受宫内人工授精的不明原因不孕症患者中,一种仅使用促性腺激素进行控制性卵巢刺激的有效替代方法:一项临床试验。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2013 Sep;111(9):589-92, 594.
8
Comparison of the efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole and clomiphene citrate as adjuvants to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial.芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬作为重组促卵泡激素辅助药物用于控制性卵巢过度刺激的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、随机、盲法临床试验。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1428-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.044. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
9
Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole versus microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI.在接受 ICSI 的卵巢反应不良的女性中,使用来曲唑的微刺激方案与 GnRH 激动剂微剂量爆发方案的比较。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Feb;29(2):105-8. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.730569. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
10
Short-term androgen priming by use of aromatase inhibitor and hCG before controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. A randomized controlled trial.在体外受精控制性卵巢刺激之前,使用芳香化酶抑制剂和人绒毛膜促性腺激素进行短期雄激素预处理。一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2008 Aug;23(8):1820-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den131. Epub 2008 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.辅助生殖的控制性卵巢刺激方案:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2.
2
Effect of letrozole cotreatment in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation on IVF/ICSI outcomes in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 poor responders: a retrospective cohort study.来曲唑联合治疗在孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激中对波塞冬3组和4组低反应者体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 22;30(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02393-x.
3
Evaluation of the Impact of Letrozole in Combination with the GnRH Antagonist Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients Expected to Have a Poor Ovarian Response (POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4).
评价来曲唑联合 GnRH 拮抗剂卵巢刺激方案对预计卵巢反应不良患者(POSEIDON 分组 3 和 4)的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 28;60(3):407. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030407.
4
Age-related changes in Folliculogenesis and potential modifiers to improve fertility outcomes - A narrative review.卵泡发生的年龄相关性变化及改善生育结局的潜在调节因素——叙述性综述。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Nov 17;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-01033-x.
5
Effects of letrozole co-treatment on outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 expected poor responders.来曲唑联用对 POSEIDON 研究 3 组和 4 组预计卵巢低反应患者促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案结局的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;306(4):1313-1319. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06676-0. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for poor and sub optimal responders?在卵巢刺激过程中,每天联合使用促性腺激素和来曲唑是否能改善卵巢反应不良和低反应患者的 IVF 结局?
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Jun 8;13(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00666-z.
7
Letrozole as co-treatment agent in ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol in poor responders: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.来曲唑作为卵巢刺激拮抗剂方案中低反应者的联合治疗药物:一项双盲随机临床试验。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 Sep 22;17(9):653-660. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5101. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Letrozole supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation in expected high responders: a pilot randomized controlled study.在预期的高反应者中进行控制性卵巢刺激时添加来曲唑补充:一项随机对照试验。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 May 10;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0483-x.
9
Recent advances in fertilization.受精领域的最新进展。
F1000Res. 2017 Aug 31;6:1616. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11701.1. eCollection 2017.
10
Mild Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI.针对接受体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的反应不良者的温和常规卵巢刺激方案
In Vivo. 2017 Mar-Apr;31(2):231-237. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11050.