Inserm U792, centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, AP-HP, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;52(2):124-41. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
The pharmacological treatment of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) pain remains challenging despite new available drugs. Such treatment should always be viewed in the context of global pain management in these patients. To date few clinical trials have been specifically devoted to this topic, and the implementation of treatments is generally based on results obtained in peripheral neuropathic pain. The aim of this review is to present evidence for efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in SCI pain and propose therapeutic recommendations.
The methodology follows the guidelines of the French Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (SOFMER). It includes a systematic review of the litterature which is performed by two independent experts. The selected studies are analysed and classified into four levels of evidence (1 to 4) and three grades of recommendations are proposed (A, B, C). The review is further validated by a reading committee.
The efficacy of pregabalin has been confirmed in neuropathic pain associated with SCI (grade A). Gabapentin has a lower level of evidence in SCI pain (grade B) but a grade A level of evidence for efficacy in peripheral neuropathic pain. Both drugs can be proposed as first line therapy and are safe to use. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) can also be proposed first line (grade B for SCI pain associated with depression, grade A for other neuropathic pain conditions), especially in patients with comorbid depressive symptoms. Tramadol can be proposed alone or in combination with antiepileptic drugs if the pain has a predominant non-neuropathic component. If these treatments fail, strong opioids can be proposed as second/third line (grade B in SCI, grade A in other types of neuropathic pain). Lamotrigine may also be proposed at this stage, particularly in patients with incomplete SCI associated with allodynia (grade B). In refractory central pain, cannabinoids may be proposed on the basis of positive results in other central pain conditions (e.g. multiple sclerosis). Intravenous ketamine and lidocaine can only be proposed in specialized centers. Drug combinations may be envisaged in case of partial response to first or second line therapy.
Very few pharmacological studies have dealt specifically with neuropathic pain related to SCI. Large scale studies and trials comparing several active drugs are warranted in SCI pain.
尽管有新的可用药物,但脊髓损伤(SCI)疼痛患者的药物治疗仍然具有挑战性。在这些患者中,此类治疗应始终置于整体疼痛管理的背景下考虑。迄今为止,很少有临床试验专门针对这一主题,并且治疗的实施通常基于在周围神经性疼痛中获得的结果。本综述的目的是提出 SCI 疼痛的药物治疗有效性和耐受性的证据,并提出治疗建议。
该方法遵循法国物理医学和康复学会(SOFMER)的指南。它包括对文献的系统综述,由两名独立专家进行。所选研究进行分析和分类为四个证据水平(1 至 4),并提出了三个推荐等级(A、B、C)。该综述由一个阅读委员会进一步验证。
普瑞巴林在与 SCI 相关的神经性疼痛中的疗效已得到证实(A级)。加巴喷丁在 SCI 疼痛中的证据水平较低(B 级),但在周围神经性疼痛中具有 A 级疗效证据。这两种药物都可以作为一线治疗药物,并且使用安全。三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)也可以作为一线治疗药物(与抑郁相关的 SCI 疼痛为 B 级,其他神经病理性疼痛情况为 A 级),特别是在伴有合并症的抑郁症状的患者中。如果疼痛具有主要的非神经性成分,则可以单独使用曲马多或与抗癫痫药物联合使用。如果这些治疗失败,可以提出第二/三线强阿片类药物(SCI 为 B 级,其他类型的神经性疼痛为 A 级)。在不完全性 SCI 伴有痛觉过敏的患者中,也可以提出拉莫三嗪(B 级)。在其他中央疼痛疾病中,大麻素的阳性结果为基础,可以在该阶段提出。静脉内氯胺酮和利多卡因只能在专门中心提出。如果对一线或二线治疗有部分反应,可以考虑药物联合治疗。
只有极少数药理学研究专门针对与 SCI 相关的神经性疼痛。需要在 SCI 疼痛中进行大规模研究和比较几种活性药物的试验。