• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Seeing both the forest and the trees: a process for tracking individual responses in focus group interviews.

作者信息

Goodwin Val, Happell Brenda

机构信息

Victoria University, Australia.

出版信息

Nurse Res. 2009;17(1):62-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2009.10.17.1.62.c7341.

DOI:10.7748/nr2009.10.17.1.62.c7341
PMID:19911655
Abstract

Focus groups are a popular component of nursing research. While they have their advantages, a number of disadvantages are apparent, such as the difficulty involved in capturing individual responses. The use of a tracking sheet would allow the researcher to identify individual responses, and thus produce separate transcripts for each participant, which can be forwarded for verification or discussion. The advantage of this approach is that the researcher is able to obtain an account from individuals in addition to the group account.

摘要

相似文献

1
Seeing both the forest and the trees: a process for tracking individual responses in focus group interviews.
Nurse Res. 2009;17(1):62-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2009.10.17.1.62.c7341.
2
Focus group interviews as a tool for psychiatric nursing research.
Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 1996 Mar;5(1):40-4.
3
Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness.结合个人访谈和焦点小组讨论以提高数据丰富度。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(2):228-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x.
4
[Focus group interview as a qualitative research method].[焦点小组访谈作为一种定性研究方法]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1995 Jun 5;157(23):3315-8.
5
The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection.学习曲线:使用焦点小组作为数据收集方法的优缺点。
Nurse Res. 2004;11(4):79-88. doi: 10.7748/nr2004.07.11.4.79.c6217.
6
Improving patient satisfaction through focus group interviews.通过焦点小组访谈提高患者满意度。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 1998 Winter;3(4):124-9.
7
Focus group interviews in health-care research.医疗保健研究中的焦点小组访谈。
Prof Nurse. 1999 Mar;14(6):395-7.
8
Focus groups in nursing research: an appropriate method or the latest fad?
Nurse Res. 2007;14(2):18-24. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.01.14.2.18.c6018.
9
The phenomenological focus group: an oxymoron?现象学焦点小组:一种矛盾修辞法?
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Mar;65(3):663-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04922.x.
10
Needs assessment of persons with multiple sclerosis and significant others: using the literature review and focus groups for preliminary survey questionnaire development.多发性硬化症患者及其重要他人的需求评估:利用文献综述和焦点小组来制定初步调查问卷
Axone. 2003 Jun;24(4):10-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Becoming Socialized into a New Professional Role: LPN to BN Student Nurses' Experiences with Legitimation.融入新的专业角色:从 licensed practical nurse(LPN)到 bachelor of nursing(BN)的学生护士的合法化经历。
Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:946063. doi: 10.1155/2012/946063. Epub 2012 Mar 29.