Suppr超能文献

少即是多:编码时 TPJ 和默认网络的去激活可预测工作记忆表现。

When less is more: TPJ and default network deactivation during encoding predicts working memory performance.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Campus Box 1125, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2638-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

Abstract

Previous work has shown that temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), part of a ventral attention network for stimulus-driven reorienting, deactivates during effortful cognitive engagement, along with the default mode network (DMN). TPJ deactivation has been reported both during working memory (WM) and rapid visual search, ostensibly to prevent reorienting to irrelevant objects. We tested whether the magnitude of this deactivation during WM encoding is predictive of subsequent WM performance. Using slow event-related fMRI and a delayed WM task in which distracter stimuli were presented during the maintenance phase, we found that greater TPJ and DMN deactivation during the encoding phase predicted better WM performance. TPJ and DMN, however, also showed several functional dissociations: (1) TPJ exhibited a different task-evoked pattern than DMN, responding to distracters sharing task-relevant features, but not to other types of distracters; and (2) TPJ showed strong functional connectivity with the DMN at encoding but not during distracter presentation. These results provide further evidence for the functional importance of TPJ suppression and indicate that TPJ and DMN deactivation is especially critical during WM trace formation. In addition, the functional connectivity results suggest that TPJ, while not part of the DMN during the resting state, may flexibly "couple" with this network depending on task demands.

摘要

先前的研究表明,颞顶联合区(TPJ)是一个腹侧注意网络的一部分,用于刺激驱动的重新定向,在努力进行认知参与时会失活,同时还会失活默认模式网络(DMN)。在工作记忆(WM)和快速视觉搜索期间都报告了 TPJ 的失活,表面上是为了防止重新定向到不相关的物体。我们测试了在 WM 编码期间这种失活的幅度是否可以预测随后的 WM 表现。使用慢事件相关 fMRI 和延迟 WM 任务,在该任务中,在维持阶段期间呈现分心刺激,我们发现,在编码阶段 TPJ 和 DMN 的失活越大,WM 表现越好。然而,TPJ 和 DMN 也表现出了几个功能上的差异:(1)TPJ 表现出与 DMN 不同的任务诱发模式,对具有任务相关特征的分心刺激做出反应,但对其他类型的分心刺激没有反应;(2)TPJ 在编码时与 DMN 显示出强烈的功能连接,但在分心物呈现时没有。这些结果为 TPJ 抑制的功能重要性提供了进一步的证据,并表明 TPJ 和 DMN 的失活在 WM 痕迹形成过程中尤为关键。此外,功能连接结果表明,TPJ 虽然在静息状态下不是 DMN 的一部分,但根据任务需求,它可能会灵活地“耦合”到该网络。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea.大脑功能的一种默认模式:一个不断演变的概念的简史。
Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 1;37(4):1083-90; discussion 1097-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
10
Self-projection and the brain.自我投射与大脑。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004. Epub 2006 Dec 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验