Non-zero mean and asymmetry of neuronal oscillations have different implications for evoked responses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to show analytically and with simulations that it is the non-zero mean of neuronal oscillations, and not an amplitude asymmetry of peaks and troughs, that is a prerequisite for the generation of evoked responses through a mechanism of amplitude modulation of oscillations. Secondly, we detail the rationale and implementation of the "baseline-shift index" (BSI) for deducing whether empirical oscillations have non-zero mean. Finally, we illustrate with empirical data why the "amplitude fluctuation asymmetry" (AFA) index should be used with caution in research aimed at explaining variability in evoked responses through a mechanism of amplitude modulation of ongoing oscillations.

METHODS

An analytical approach, simulations and empirical MEG data were used to compare the specificity of BSI and AFA index to differentiate between a non-zero mean and a non-sinusoidal shape of neuronal oscillations.

RESULTS

Both the BSI and the AFA index were sensitive to the presence of non-zero mean in neuronal oscillations. The AFA index, however, was also sensitive to the shape of oscillations even when they had a zero mean.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that it is the non-zero mean of neuronal oscillations, and not an amplitude asymmetry of peaks and troughs, that is a prerequisite for the generation of evoked responses through a mechanism of amplitude modulation of oscillations.

SIGNIFICANCE

A clear distinction should be made between the shape and non-zero mean properties of neuronal oscillations. This is because only the latter contributes to evoked responses, whereas the former does not.