Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Clin Immunol. 2010 May;135(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
There are an expanding number of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs), each associated with unique diagnostic and therapeutic complexities. Limited data, however, exist supporting specific therapeutic interventions. Thus, a survey of PIDD management was administered to allergists/immunologists in the United States to identify current perspectives and practices. Among 405 respondents, the majority of key management practices identified were consistent with existing data and guidelines, including the provision of immunoglobulin therapy, immunoglobulin dosing and selective avoidance of live viral vaccines. Practices for which there are little specific data or evidence-based guidance were also examined, including evaluation of IgG trough levels for patients receiving immunoglobulin, use of prophylactic antibiotics and recommendations for complementary/alternative medicine. Here, variability applied to PIDD patients was identified. Differences between practitioners clinically focused upon PIDD and general allergists/immunologists were also identified. Thus, a need for expanded clinical research in PIDD to optimize management and potentially improve outcomes was defined.
原发性免疫缺陷病(PID)的种类在不断增加,每种疾病都有其独特的诊断和治疗难点。然而,支持特定治疗干预措施的相关数据有限。因此,我们对美国的过敏症/免疫学家进行了一项 PID 管理调查,以了解当前的观点和实践。在 405 名受访者中,大多数确定的关键管理实践与现有数据和指南一致,包括提供免疫球蛋白治疗、免疫球蛋白剂量和选择性避免使用活病毒疫苗。对于那些数据很少或没有循证医学指导的实践,也进行了检查,包括对接受免疫球蛋白治疗的患者进行 IgG 谷值评估、使用预防性抗生素以及对补充/替代医学的建议。在此,确定了 PID 患者的可变性。还发现了专注于 PID 的临床医生和一般过敏症/免疫学家之间的差异。因此,明确了需要在 PID 中开展更多的临床研究,以优化管理并可能改善结果。