Urban Governance and Health, United Kingdom and 2French School of Public Health (EHESP),Rennes, France.
Health Promot Int. 2009 Nov;24 Suppl 1:i100-i107. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap060.
National networks of Healthy Cities emerged in the late 1980s as a spontaneous reaction to a great demand by cities to participate in the Healthy Cities movement. Today, they engage at least 1300 cities in the European region and form the backbone of the Healthy Cities movement. This article provides an analysis of the results of the regular surveys of national networks that have been carried out principally since 1997. The main functions and achievements of national networks are presented alongside some of their most pressing challenges. Although networks have differing priorities and organizational characteristics, they do share common goals and strategic directions based on the Healthy Cities model (see other articles in this special edition of HPI). Therefore, it has been possible to identify a set of organizational and strategic factors that contribute to the success of networks. These factors form the basis of a set of accreditation criteria for national networks and provide guidance for the establishment of new national networks. Although national networks have made substantial achievements, they continue to face a number of dilemmas that are discussed in the article. Problems a national network must deal with include how to obtain sustainable funding, how to raise the standard of work in cities without creating exclusive participation criteria and how to balance the need to provide direct support to cities with its role as a national player. These dilemmas are similar to other public sector networks. During the last 15 years, the pooling of practical expertise in urban health has made Healthy Cities networks an important resource for national as well as local governments. Not only do they provide valuable support to their members but they often advise ministries and other national institutions on effective models to promote sustainable urban health development.
国家健康城市网络于 20 世纪 80 年代末出现,是对城市参与健康城市运动的巨大需求的自发反应。如今,它们至少有 1300 个城市参与其中,是健康城市运动的骨干。本文分析了自 1997 年以来主要开展的国家网络定期调查的结果。本文展示了国家网络的主要职能和成就,以及它们面临的一些最紧迫的挑战。尽管网络具有不同的优先事项和组织特征,但它们确实基于健康城市模式共享共同的目标和战略方向(参见本特刊中其他文章)。因此,可以确定有助于网络成功的一系列组织和战略因素。这些因素构成了国家网络认证标准的基础,并为新的国家网络的建立提供了指导。尽管国家网络取得了重大成就,但它们仍面临一些本文讨论的困境。国家网络必须应对的问题包括如何获得可持续的资金、如何在不设定排他性参与标准的情况下提高城市工作标准,以及如何平衡为城市提供直接支持的需求与其作为国家参与者的角色。这些困境与其他公共部门网络类似。在过去的 15 年中,城市健康方面实践专业知识的汇集使健康城市网络成为国家和地方政府的重要资源。它们不仅为成员提供了有价值的支持,而且经常就促进可持续城市健康发展的有效模式向部委和其他国家机构提供建议。