• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开展腹腔镜根治性肾切除术需要多少例手术?

How many cases are necessary to develop competence for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy?

机构信息

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2009 Dec;23(12):1965-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0636.

DOI:10.1089/end.2008.0636
PMID:19916754
Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated the number of cases necessary to develop competence for performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) by chronologically analyzing the results of 150 cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

150 patients were included in this study, each of whom had had pure transperitoneal LRNs between March 2003 and February 2008 performed by three surgeons who were all novices in laparoscopic surgery. Each surgeon performed 50 LRNs. These were divided into 10 groups chronologically, with five cases in each group (individual-group). Subsequently, we combined the data of the three surgeons, with 15 cases assigned to each group (combined-group). We identified the groups that demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operative time, compared with the most recent group. Based on this finding, we divided the cases into two groups: The novice group and the competent group. The complication rate, transfusion rate, and estimated blood loss were then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The total average operative time was 187.6 +/- 46.56 minutes; from group 4 onward, there was no significant decrease in the operative time. Therefore, groups 1 to 3 were defined as the novice groups, and groups 4 to 10 as the competent groups. Incidence of intraoperative complications was six (13.3%) in the novice group and nine (8.6%) in the competent group. There were 14 cases with postoperative complications--4 (8.9%) in the novice group and 10 (9.5%) in the competent group. There were significant differences in the estimated blood loss and transfusion rate between the novice and competent groups (236.4 +/- 41.85 mL vs 191.5 +/- 21.9 mL, 17.8% vs 4.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that 15 cases are needed for a novice surgeon to achieve competence in LRN. Surgical outcomes and morbidity can be improved once this learning curve has been overcome.

摘要

目的

通过对 150 例病例的结果进行时间顺序分析,评估腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)的胜任能力所需的病例数。

方法

本研究纳入了 150 例患者,每位患者均由 3 位腹腔镜手术新手外科医生行纯经腹腔 LRN,手术时间均在 2003 年 3 月至 2008 年 2 月之间。每位外科医生进行了 50 例 LRN。这些病例按时间顺序分为 10 组,每组 5 例(个体组)。随后,我们将 3 位外科医生的数据合并,每组 15 例(联合组)。我们确定了与最近一组相比手术时间存在统计学差异的组。基于这一发现,我们将病例分为两组:新手组和胜任组。然后比较两组之间的并发症发生率、输血率和估计出血量。

结果

总平均手术时间为 187.6 +/- 46.56 分钟;从第 4 组开始,手术时间没有明显下降。因此,第 1 至 3 组定义为新手组,第 4 至 10 组定义为胜任组。新手组术中并发症发生率为 6 例(13.3%),胜任组为 9 例(8.6%)。术后并发症 14 例,新手组 4 例(8.9%),胜任组 10 例(9.5%)。新手组和胜任组之间估计出血量和输血率有显著差异(236.4 +/- 41.85 毫升比 191.5 +/- 21.9 毫升,17.8%比 4.8%)。

结论

我们的结果表明,新手外科医生需要 15 例病例才能胜任 LRN。一旦克服了学习曲线,手术结果和发病率就可以得到改善。

相似文献

1
How many cases are necessary to develop competence for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy?开展腹腔镜根治性肾切除术需要多少例手术?
J Endourol. 2009 Dec;23(12):1965-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0636.
2
Clinical experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的临床经验
Urol Int. 2008;81(3):301-5. doi: 10.1159/000151408. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
3
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations.肥胖患者的腹腔镜根治性肾切除术:手术结果及技术要点
Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):247-52; discussion 252. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.077.
4
The operative safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy for T3 renal cell cancer.腹腔镜肾切除术治疗 T3 期肾细胞癌的手术安全性和肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):884-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10850.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
5
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a comparative study.经腹与腹膜后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术:一项对比研究。
Int J Urol. 2009 Mar;16(3):263-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02219.x. Epub 2008 Dec 14.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: the transfer of experience to a new academic center.手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术:经验向新学术中心的传授
J Endourol. 2004 Nov;18(9):840-3. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.840.
7
Supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons.技术合格的外科医生的监督影响新手外科医生进行腹腔镜结直肠切除术的熟练程度和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):436-442. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5701-z. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience in Israel with 110 cases.腹腔镜肾切除术:以色列110例的初步经验。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Jul;7(7):431-4.
9
Single-center comparison of purely laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open radical nephrectomy in patients at high anesthetic risk.高麻醉风险患者中单纯腹腔镜、手辅助腹腔镜及开放根治性肾切除术的单中心比较
J Endourol. 2003 Apr;17(3):161-7. doi: 10.1089/089277903321618725.
10
Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes.腹腔镜根治性与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗 T1bN0M0 期临床肾肿瘤:围手术期、病理和功能结局比较。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1603-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0312.

引用本文的文献

1
The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: a systematic review.泌尿外科主要腹腔镜和机器人手术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2037-2057. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345.
2
Laparoscopic nephrectomy simplified - A "two-window technique" for safer approach to hilum for a novice.简化的腹腔镜肾切除术——一种供新手更安全地接近肾门的“双窗口技术”
Indian J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):254-259. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_231_18.
3
Should oncological cases of upper urinary system be excluded at the beginning of the laparoscopic learning curve?
在腹腔镜学习曲线的起始阶段,是否应将上泌尿系统肿瘤病例排除在外?
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):707-13. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0134.
4
In 2013, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) may be the new 'gold standard'.2013 年,钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)可能成为新的“金标准”。
Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Dec;13(6):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0279-4.