Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2009 Nov;11(11):737-47.
Therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer has been improved in terms of response rate, time to progression and overall survival by the emergence of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) in combination with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy (oxaliplatin or CPT-11-based combinations). However, the benefits of cetuximab and panitumumab are confined to KRAS wild-type (KRAS-wt) colorectal tumours; KRAS-mutated tumours rarely respond to these drugs. Of all colorectal tumours, 65% are KRAS-wt tumours, but anti-EGFR therapies are effective for only 60-70% of these. Therefore, other biomarkers and molecular pathways must be involved in the response to anti-EGFR therapies in KRASwt colorectal tumours. Factors that may explain the lack of response include EGFR ligands, EGFR phosphorylation levels, the number of EGFR copies, the status of the KRAS effector B-RAF and the alternative intracellular PIK3CA/ PTEN/AKT and JAK/STAT signalling pathways. A battery of biomarkers is needed to select the patients that will be most sensitive to anti-EGFR therapies. Such patterns may be a novel and cost-effective tool to develop tailored treatments. This manuscript will review biomarkers and molecular pathways that are involved in the tumour response to anti-EGFR therapies.
抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体(西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗)与标准细胞毒性化疗(奥沙利铂或 CPT-11 为基础的联合方案)联合应用,提高了转移性结直肠癌的反应率、无进展时间和总生存期。然而,西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗的获益仅限于 KRAS 野生型(KRAS-wt)结直肠肿瘤;KRAS 突变型肿瘤对这些药物很少有反应。在所有结直肠肿瘤中,65%为 KRAS-wt 肿瘤,但抗 EGFR 治疗仅对其中的 60-70%有效。因此,其他生物标志物和分子途径必须参与 KRASwt 结直肠肿瘤对抗 EGFR 治疗的反应。可能导致无反应的因素包括 EGFR 配体、EGFR 磷酸化水平、EGFR 拷贝数、KRAS 效应物 B-RAF 的状态以及替代的细胞内 PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT 和 JAK/STAT 信号通路。需要一组生物标志物来选择对抗 EGFR 治疗最敏感的患者。这种模式可能是开发个体化治疗的一种新的、具有成本效益的工具。本文将综述参与肿瘤对抗 EGFR 治疗反应的生物标志物和分子途径。