Suppr超能文献

室性快速心律失常的药物治疗:多少项电药理学试验是合适的?

Drug therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias: how many electropharmacologic trials are appropriate?

作者信息

Kavanagh K M, Wyse D G, Duff H J, Gillis A M, Sheldon R S, Mitchell L B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Foothills General Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Feb;17(2):391-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80104-4.

Abstract

To determine how many electropharmacologic drug trials should be performed to select therapy for patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the outcome of 150 consecutive patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias undergoing serial electropharmacologic testing was examined. The probability of identifying predicted effective therapy (inductive of fewer than five ventricular responses with three ventricular extrastimuli at three pacing cycle lengths) and the probability of that therapy preventing sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrences were determined as a function of the number of preceding trials. The probability ( +/- SE) of identifying predicted effective therapy by the first trial (0.23 +/- 0.03) was significantly higher than that of the second (0.09 +/- 0.04), third (0.08 +/- 0.04) and fourth (0.05 +/- 0.04) trials (p = 0.001). No patient had predicted effective therapy identified by subsequent trials. The 2 year actuarial probability of freedom from sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias on predicted effective therapy was higher for the first (0.79 +/- 0.08), second (0.73 +/- 0.13) and third (0.86 +/- 0.13) trials than for the fourth (0.33 +/- 0.27) trial (p = 0.02). Thus, the probability of selecting therapy with long-term efficacy was highest for the first trial (0.18), intermediate for the second (0.07) and third (0.07) trials and lowest for the fourth (0.02) and subsequent (0.00) trials. Accordingly, the electropharmacologic approach to therapy selection should be abandoned after three unsuccessful trials.

摘要

为了确定应进行多少次电药理学药物试验以选择治疗室性心律失常患者的疗法,我们对150例连续的可诱发室性心律失常患者进行系列电药理学测试的结果进行了研究。确定识别预测有效疗法(在三个起搏周期长度下,三个室性期外刺激诱发少于五次室性反应)的概率以及该疗法预防持续性室性心律失常复发的概率,并将其作为先前试验次数的函数。第一次试验识别预测有效疗法的概率(±标准误)为0.23±0.03,显著高于第二次(0.09±0.04)、第三次(0.08±0.04)和第四次(0.05±0.04)试验(p = 0.001)。后续试验未识别出有预测有效疗法的患者。对于第一次(0.79±0.08)、第二次(0.73±0.13)和第三次(0.86±0.13)试验,预测有效疗法下无持续性室性心律失常的2年精算概率高于第四次(0.33±0.27)试验(p = 0.02)。因此,选择具有长期疗效疗法的概率在第一次试验时最高(0.18),第二次(0.07)和第三次(0.07)试验时为中等,第四次(0.02)及后续试验时最低(0.00)。因此,在三次试验失败后应放弃电药理学疗法选择方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验