• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的自我血糖监测(SMBG):法国、德国、意大利和西班牙的成本效益。

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes on oral anti-diabetes drugs: cost-effectiveness in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.

机构信息

IMS Health, Inc. Falls Church, VA 22046, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):163-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990903429765.

DOI:10.1185/03007990903429765
PMID:19919377
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stakeholders in Europe remain interested in assessments of country-specific value of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral anti-diabetes drugs (OADs). This study used the IMS-CORE Diabetes Model to project the long-term (40-year) cost-effectiveness of SMBG at once, twice, or three times per day (vs. no SMBG) for this population from national reimbursement system perspectives in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.

METHODS

SMBG input costs (strips, lancets, meters, nurse training) were supplied by LifeScan in 2007 euro values and applied as appropriate for each country's reimbursement policy. Cohort characteristics and assumed Hb(A1c) effects came from a US Kaiser Permanente longitudinal analysis of new SMBG users. Country-specific estimations for use of screening programs and several concomitant medications, as well as mortality rates were used. Country-specific complication costs from published sources were inflated to 2007 euro. Base case outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum for France, Germany, and Italy; 6% for Spain. Sensitivity analyses varied time horizon and discount rates for each country. They also included a -0.036 dis-utility for SMBG in year 1.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes included total direct costs, gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over 40 years.

RESULTS

ICERs were largest in France (with meter costs included), and in Italy (with highest reimbursed costs for strips/lancets). ICERs for SMBG once, twice, and three times per day were 12,114 euros, 6282 euros, and 7958 euros (respectively) in France; and 12,694 euros, 11,934 euros, and 15,368 euros in Italy. ICERs for SMBG once or twice per day were <2000 euros in Germany and <4000 euros in Spain. ICERs for SMBG three times per day were <6000 euros/QALY in both countries. Results were most sensitive to the 5-year time horizon, although ICERs for SMBG once per day were below 50,000 euros/QALY in all countries but Italy (ICER = 77,064 euros). Five-year ICERs for SMBG twice per day were below 40,000 euros/QALY for all four countries, and those for SMBG three times per day were below 45,000 euros/QALY. With the SMBG dis-utility, ICERs increased modestly (321 euros- 2264 euros/QALY) in all scenarios except SMBG once per day in France (9578 euros increase) and Italy (5979 euros increase). Study limitations include the use of relatively short-term data from a single US observational study for SMBG clinical effects, unknown levels of patient adherence, and assumptions regarding the duration of clinical effects.

CONCLUSIONS

With cost assumptions reflecting current reimbursement levels in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, SMBG was found to be cost-effective across a 40-year time horizon, with all base case ICERs <16,000/QALY. This study adds to the literature on the country-specific, long-term value of SMBG for type 2 diabetes patients treated with OADs. Under current model assumptions, variations in cost-effectiveness results stemmed primarily from payer reimbursement practices for SMBG within each country.

摘要

目的

欧洲的利益相关者仍然对评估口服抗糖尿病药物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的自我血糖监测(SMBG)的国家特定价值感兴趣。本研究使用 IMS-CORE 糖尿病模型,从国家报销系统的角度出发,在法国、德国、意大利和西班牙,对每天一次、两次或三次(与不进行 SMBG 相比)进行 SMBG 的长期(40 年)成本效益进行了预测。

方法

SMBG 的输入成本(条带、 lancets、 meters、护士培训)由 LifeScan 于 2007 年欧元价值提供,并根据每个国家的报销政策进行适当应用。队列特征和假设的 Hb(A1c)影响来自美国 Kaiser Permanente 对新 SMBG 用户的纵向分析。使用了特定国家的筛查计划和几种伴随药物的使用情况以及死亡率的估计值。使用已发表的资源对国家特定的并发症成本进行了膨胀处理,以达到 2007 年的欧元水平。基础情况的结果按每年 3%的贴现率贴现,法国、德国和意大利为 3%;西班牙为 6%。敏感性分析针对每个国家的时间范围和贴现率进行了变化。它们还包括在第 1 年对 SMBG 的 -0.036 不舒适。

主要观察结果

主要观察结果包括在 40 年内的总直接成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)的增加和增量成本效益比(ICERs)。

结果

在包含血糖仪成本的法国,以及在最高补偿带/ lancets 成本的意大利,ICERs 最大。在法国,SMBG 每天一次、两次和三次的 ICER 分别为 12114 欧元、6282 欧元和 7958 欧元;在意大利,ICER 分别为 12694 欧元、11934 欧元和 15368 欧元。在德国,SMBG 每天一次或两次的 ICER 低于 2000 欧元,在西班牙,ICER 低于 4000 欧元。在这两个国家,SMBG 每天三次的 ICER 低于 6000 欧元/QALY。结果对 5 年时间范围最为敏感,尽管在所有国家(意大利除外,ICER = 77064 欧元),SMBG 每天一次的 ICER 低于 50000 欧元/QALY。在所有四个国家中,SMBG 每天两次的 5 年 ICER 低于 40000 欧元/QALY,SMBG 每天三次的 5 年 ICER 低于 45000 欧元/QALY。在考虑 SMBG 不舒适的情况下,除了法国(增加 9578 欧元)和意大利(增加 5979 欧元)每天一次 SMBG 的情况下,所有情况下的 ICER 都适度增加(321 欧元-2264 欧元/QALY)。研究的局限性包括使用相对较短的来自单一美国观察性研究的数据来评估 SMBG 的临床效果、未知的患者依从性水平以及关于临床效果持续时间的假设。

结论

在反映法国、德国、意大利和西班牙当前报销水平的成本假设下,SMBG 在 40 年的时间范围内具有成本效益,所有基础情况的 ICER 都<16000 欧元/QALY。本研究增加了关于口服抗糖尿病药物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者 SMBG 的国家特定、长期价值的文献。在当前模型假设下,成本效益结果的变化主要源于每个国家的 SMBG 报销实践。

相似文献

1
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes on oral anti-diabetes drugs: cost-effectiveness in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的自我血糖监测(SMBG):法国、德国、意大利和西班牙的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):163-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990903429765.
2
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for type 2 diabetes patients treated with oral anti-diabetes drugs and with a recent history of monitoring: cost-effectiveness in the US.口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者和近期有监测史的自我血糖监测(SMBG):美国的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):151-62. doi: 10.1185/03007990903400071.
3
Cost effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for patients with type 2 diabetes and not on insulin: impact of modelling assumptions on recent Canadian findings.2 型糖尿病且未使用胰岛素的患者自我血糖监测(SMBG)的成本效益:建模假设对最近加拿大研究结果的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Nov 1;9(6):351-65. doi: 10.2165/11594270-000000000-00000.
4
Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.延长依诺肝素治疗以预防初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞。一项成本效益分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Oct;124(8):507-17. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0720-3. Epub 2004 Sep 10.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of pioglitazone plus metformin compared with rosiglitazone plus metformin from a third-party payer perspective in the US.从美国第三方支付者的角度看,吡格列酮加二甲双胍与罗格列酮加二甲双胍的成本效益分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jun;25(6):1343-53. doi: 10.1185/03007990902870084.
6
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart in poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in China.在中国血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中转换为使用双相门冬胰岛素的成本效益分析
Adv Ther. 2008 Aug;25(8):752-74. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0080-4.
7
Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in five European countries.在五个欧洲国家中,使用基础-餐时胰岛素方案的 1 型糖尿病患者中,地特胰岛素对比中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2009 Jun;12(2):114-23. doi: 10.3111/13696990903080344.
8
Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Multicenter analysis including 24,500 patients from 191 centers in Germany and Austria.血糖自我监测频率与长期代谢控制有关吗?对来自德国和奥地利191个中心的24500名患者进行的多中心分析。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006 Jul;114(7):384-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924152.
9
Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: a European model based on the CLARITY and COMMIT trials.氯吡格雷在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的成本效益:基于CLARITY和COMMIT试验的欧洲模型
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1184-202. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.020.
10
Review of the cost of diabetes complications in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Spain.澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、德国、意大利和西班牙糖尿病并发症成本综述。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1617-29. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65349.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of diabetes self-care activities in patients with type 2 diabetes based on self-determination theory.基于自我决定理论的2型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理活动的决定因素
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Mar;61(3):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02186-w. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
The Economic Burden of Insulin-Related Hypoglycemia in Adults with Diabetes: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Italian Healthcare System.成人糖尿病患者胰岛素相关低血糖的经济负担:来自意大利医疗保健系统视角的分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1037-1047. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0418-0. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
How Consistent is the Relationship between Improved Glucose Control and Modelled Health Outcomes for People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? a Systematic Review.
2型糖尿病患者血糖控制改善与模拟健康结局之间的关系有多一致?一项系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):319-329. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0466-0.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes.实时连续血糖监测(RT-CGM)在2型糖尿病中的成本效益
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 28;10(4):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1932296816628547. Print 2016 Jul.
5
The direct and indirect cost of diabetes in Italy: a prevalence probabilistic approach.意大利糖尿病的直接和间接成本:一种患病率概率方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Mar;17(2):139-47. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0660-y. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
6
Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes: from evidence to clinical reality in Central and Eastern Europe--recommendations from the international Central-Eastern European expert group.糖尿病患者的血糖自我监测:从中东欧的证据到临床实践——中东欧国际专家组的建议
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Jul;16(7):460-75. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0302. Epub 2014 Apr 9.