*Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, daggerTulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, double daggerPrivate Practice, Louisville, Kentucky, section signKentucky Lions Eye Research Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, and Departments of Ophthalmic Clinical Research and paragraph signBiostatistics, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
J Glaucoma. 1993 Fall;2(3):177-82.
We evaluated a topical formulation of timolol in an anionic heteropolysaccharide gellan gum (Gelrite). Fifty-five white patients with ocular hypertension entered a double-masked, placebo-controlled, four-period, incomplete block crossover study. After washout of any ocular hypotensive medications, the intraocular pressure of both eyes of all patients was measured at 0 (09:00 h), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h (diurnal baseline). Patients were then randomized to receive, at 2-week intervals, one drop of each of four of the six treatments in one eye (0.008% timolol gel, 0.1% timolol gel, placebo gel, 0.008% timolol solution, 0.1% timolol solution, and placebo solution). Fellow eyes received the appropriate placebo. As measured by least-squares means, adjusted for the unmedicated baseline diurnal values, there was a clear dose-response, with the 0.1% treatments being more effective ocular hypotensive agents than the 0.008% treatments, which in turn were more effective than the placebo treatments. Within each concentration at several observation points, the gel formulation elicited a 1-2-mm Hg greater efficacy than the solution. Gel-treated subjects had a greater incidence of blurred vision. We conclude that formulation of timolol with a gel may increase efficacy, and thus duration of action. This may possibly allow use of a lower concentration of timolol or a reduced frequency of instillation. Further evaluation in chronic dosing studies is justified.
我们评估了一种含有阴离子杂多糖胶凝糖(Gelrite)的噻吗洛尔局部制剂。55 名患有眼压升高的白人患者参与了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、四期不完全块交叉研究。在洗脱任何降眼压药物后,所有患者双眼的眼压在 0(09:00 h)、2、4、6、8、12 和 24 h(日间基线)进行测量。然后,患者被随机分为每隔两周在一只眼接受四种治疗方法中的一种(0.008%噻吗洛尔凝胶、0.1%噻吗洛尔凝胶、安慰剂凝胶、0.008%噻吗洛尔溶液、0.1%噻吗洛尔溶液和安慰剂溶液)。对侧眼接受相应的安慰剂。通过最小二乘法均值进行测量,并根据未经药物治疗的日间基线值进行调整,存在明显的剂量反应,0.1%的治疗方法比 0.008%的治疗方法更有效降低眼压,而 0.008%的治疗方法又比安慰剂治疗方法更有效。在几个观察点的每个浓度中,凝胶制剂的疗效比溶液高 1-2mmHg。接受凝胶治疗的患者视力模糊的发生率更高。我们得出结论,用凝胶制剂制备噻吗洛尔可能会增加疗效,从而延长作用时间。这可能允许使用更低浓度的噻吗洛尔或减少滴眼次数。在慢性给药研究中进一步评估是合理的。