Suppr超能文献

每日一次噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%和通用马来酸噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%在青光眼和/或高眼压症中的短期耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、阳性对照、三周期交叉先导研究。

Short-term tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension: a prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, three-period crossover pilot study.

机构信息

Midwest Eye Center, Bourbonnais, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2063-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare symptoms and anterior segment tolerability with short-term (3-day) administration of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in the treatment of glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, 3-period crossover pilot study, eligible patients had primary open-angle, pigment-dispersion, or exfoliation glaucoma, and/or ocular hypertension in > or = 1 eye; had a best corrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better in each eye, as measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing chart; were receiving 1 glaucoma medication; and had an untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) of < or = 28 mm Hg in both eyes after washout (if required) at visit 2 (day 0). Patients were assigned to receive, in randomized order, timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol in sorbate 0.5%, or generic timolol gel-forming solution 0.5%, 1 drop each morning (approximately 8 am) in the qualified eye(s) (washout IOP < or = 28 mm Hg) for 3 days. Each treatment period was separated by a 7-day washout period. At all baseline and end-of-treatment study visits, patients completed a solicited symptom survey (used for the assessment of stinging or burning [grade 0 = none to 4 = severe] and blurred or dimmed vision [grade 0 = none to 4 = severe], among other parameters) and underwent ETDRS, Goldmann applanation tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, anterior segment staining (corneal, conjunctival nasal, and conjunctival temporal staining), conjunctival hyperemia assessment, measurement of tear breakup time, and Schirmer's testing with anesthesia. At end-of-treatment assessments, patients were questioned about adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled (15 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [8.9] years; white, 19 patients, black, 11; primary open-angle glaucoma, 17; ocular hypertension, 13). Mean (SD) stinging or burning grade was significantly greater with timolol in sorbate compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol gel-forming solution (0.9 [0.9] vs 0.4 [0.6] and 0.2 [0.6], respectively; P < 0.001). The between-treatment differences on anterior segment staining, conjunctival hyperemia, tear breakup time, and Schirmer's testing with anesthesia were not significant, with the exception of the change from baseline in conjunctival nasal staining by count, which was significantly higher with timolol gel-forming solution compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (3.1 [13.4] vs -2.9 [10.1] and -3.0 [8.0], respectively; P = 0.04). On the solicited symptom survey, timolol gel-forming solution was associated with a poorer mean score on blurred or dimmed vision compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (0.3 [0.7] vs 0.1 [0.3] and 0.0 [0.2], respectively; P = 0.02). Mean best corrected ETDRS visual acuity immediately after instillation was significantly lower with timolol gel-forming solution compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (49.6 [8.4] vs 53.0 [6.1] and 53.1 [6.7], respectively; P = 0.007). The mean 24-hour trough IOP did not differ significantly between the 3 treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study that compared the symptoms and tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol in sorbate 0.5%, and timolol gel-forming solution 0.5% in these patients with glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension, short-term (3-day) administration of timolol in sorbate was associated with more stinging or burning compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol gel-forming solution. Timolol gel-forming solution was associated with more postinstillation blurred or dimmed vision compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较单剂量(3 天)使用噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%和通用马来酸噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%治疗青光眼和/或高眼压症时的症状和眼前段耐受性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、主动对照、3 期交叉先导研究,合格患者患有原发性开角型、色素性播散型或剥脱性青光眼,和/或高眼压症,且≥1 只眼;最佳矫正视力在每只眼均为 1.0 或更好,使用早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力测试图表进行测量;正在接受 1 种青光眼药物治疗;并且在第 2 次就诊(第 0 天)洗脱(如果需要)后双眼的未治疗眼内压(IOP)均<或=28mmHg。患者被随机分配接受噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%或通用马来酸噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%,每天早上(大约 8 点)在合格的眼睛(洗脱 IOP<或=28mmHg)中各滴 1 滴,持续 3 天。每个治疗期之间间隔 7 天洗脱期。在所有基线和治疗结束时的研究访问中,患者完成了一项征询问卷调查(用于评估刺痛或烧灼感[等级 0=无到 4=严重]和视力模糊或变暗[等级 0=无到 4=严重]等参数),并进行了 ETDRS、Goldmann 压平眼压计、裂隙灯生物显微镜检查、眼前段染色(角膜、结膜鼻侧和结膜颞侧染色)、结膜充血评估、泪膜破裂时间测量和麻醉性 Schirmer 测试。在治疗结束时的评估中,询问了患者关于不良事件的情况。

结果

共纳入 30 名患者(男性 15 名,女性 15 名;平均[标准差]年龄 66.3[8.9]岁;白人 19 名,黑人 11 名;原发性开角型青光眼 17 名;高眼压症 13 名)。与噻吗洛尔半水合物和噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液相比,马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐的刺痛或烧灼感评分显著更高(0.9[0.9]与 0.4[0.6]和 0.2[0.6];P<0.001)。在眼前段染色、结膜充血、泪膜破裂时间和麻醉性 Schirmer 测试方面,治疗之间的差异不显著,除了基线时结膜鼻侧染色计数的变化,与噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐相比,噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液的变化显著更高(3.1[13.4]与-2.9[10.1]和-3.0[8.0];P=0.04)。在征询问卷上,与噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐相比,噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液与更差的视力模糊或变暗评分相关(0.3[0.7]与 0.1[0.3]和 0.0[0.2];P=0.02)。滴注后立即进行最佳矫正 ETDRS 视力的平均得分显著低于噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐(49.6[8.4]与 53.0[6.1]和 53.1[6.7];P=0.007)。3 种治疗方法之间的 24 小时平均谷眼压差异无显著差异。

结论

在这项比较青光眼和/或高眼压症患者单剂量噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%和噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%的症状和耐受性的先导研究中,短期(3 天)使用马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐治疗与噻吗洛尔半水合物和噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液相比,更易引起刺痛或烧灼感。与噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐相比,噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液在滴注后更易引起视力模糊或变暗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验