• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%和通用马来酸噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%在青光眼和/或高眼压症中的短期耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、阳性对照、三周期交叉先导研究。

Short-term tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension: a prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, three-period crossover pilot study.

机构信息

Midwest Eye Center, Bourbonnais, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2063-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.003
PMID:19922877
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare symptoms and anterior segment tolerability with short-term (3-day) administration of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in the treatment of glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, 3-period crossover pilot study, eligible patients had primary open-angle, pigment-dispersion, or exfoliation glaucoma, and/or ocular hypertension in > or = 1 eye; had a best corrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better in each eye, as measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing chart; were receiving 1 glaucoma medication; and had an untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) of < or = 28 mm Hg in both eyes after washout (if required) at visit 2 (day 0). Patients were assigned to receive, in randomized order, timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol in sorbate 0.5%, or generic timolol gel-forming solution 0.5%, 1 drop each morning (approximately 8 am) in the qualified eye(s) (washout IOP < or = 28 mm Hg) for 3 days. Each treatment period was separated by a 7-day washout period. At all baseline and end-of-treatment study visits, patients completed a solicited symptom survey (used for the assessment of stinging or burning [grade 0 = none to 4 = severe] and blurred or dimmed vision [grade 0 = none to 4 = severe], among other parameters) and underwent ETDRS, Goldmann applanation tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, anterior segment staining (corneal, conjunctival nasal, and conjunctival temporal staining), conjunctival hyperemia assessment, measurement of tear breakup time, and Schirmer's testing with anesthesia. At end-of-treatment assessments, patients were questioned about adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled (15 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [8.9] years; white, 19 patients, black, 11; primary open-angle glaucoma, 17; ocular hypertension, 13). Mean (SD) stinging or burning grade was significantly greater with timolol in sorbate compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol gel-forming solution (0.9 [0.9] vs 0.4 [0.6] and 0.2 [0.6], respectively; P < 0.001). The between-treatment differences on anterior segment staining, conjunctival hyperemia, tear breakup time, and Schirmer's testing with anesthesia were not significant, with the exception of the change from baseline in conjunctival nasal staining by count, which was significantly higher with timolol gel-forming solution compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (3.1 [13.4] vs -2.9 [10.1] and -3.0 [8.0], respectively; P = 0.04). On the solicited symptom survey, timolol gel-forming solution was associated with a poorer mean score on blurred or dimmed vision compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (0.3 [0.7] vs 0.1 [0.3] and 0.0 [0.2], respectively; P = 0.02). Mean best corrected ETDRS visual acuity immediately after instillation was significantly lower with timolol gel-forming solution compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (49.6 [8.4] vs 53.0 [6.1] and 53.1 [6.7], respectively; P = 0.007). The mean 24-hour trough IOP did not differ significantly between the 3 treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study that compared the symptoms and tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol in sorbate 0.5%, and timolol gel-forming solution 0.5% in these patients with glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension, short-term (3-day) administration of timolol in sorbate was associated with more stinging or burning compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol gel-forming solution. Timolol gel-forming solution was associated with more postinstillation blurred or dimmed vision compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较单剂量(3 天)使用噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%和通用马来酸噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%治疗青光眼和/或高眼压症时的症状和眼前段耐受性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、主动对照、3 期交叉先导研究,合格患者患有原发性开角型、色素性播散型或剥脱性青光眼,和/或高眼压症,且≥1 只眼;最佳矫正视力在每只眼均为 1.0 或更好,使用早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力测试图表进行测量;正在接受 1 种青光眼药物治疗;并且在第 2 次就诊(第 0 天)洗脱(如果需要)后双眼的未治疗眼内压(IOP)均<或=28mmHg。患者被随机分配接受噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%或通用马来酸噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%,每天早上(大约 8 点)在合格的眼睛(洗脱 IOP<或=28mmHg)中各滴 1 滴,持续 3 天。每个治疗期之间间隔 7 天洗脱期。在所有基线和治疗结束时的研究访问中,患者完成了一项征询问卷调查(用于评估刺痛或烧灼感[等级 0=无到 4=严重]和视力模糊或变暗[等级 0=无到 4=严重]等参数),并进行了 ETDRS、Goldmann 压平眼压计、裂隙灯生物显微镜检查、眼前段染色(角膜、结膜鼻侧和结膜颞侧染色)、结膜充血评估、泪膜破裂时间测量和麻醉性 Schirmer 测试。在治疗结束时的评估中,询问了患者关于不良事件的情况。

结果

共纳入 30 名患者(男性 15 名,女性 15 名;平均[标准差]年龄 66.3[8.9]岁;白人 19 名,黑人 11 名;原发性开角型青光眼 17 名;高眼压症 13 名)。与噻吗洛尔半水合物和噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液相比,马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐的刺痛或烧灼感评分显著更高(0.9[0.9]与 0.4[0.6]和 0.2[0.6];P<0.001)。在眼前段染色、结膜充血、泪膜破裂时间和麻醉性 Schirmer 测试方面,治疗之间的差异不显著,除了基线时结膜鼻侧染色计数的变化,与噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐相比,噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液的变化显著更高(3.1[13.4]与-2.9[10.1]和-3.0[8.0];P=0.04)。在征询问卷上,与噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐相比,噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液与更差的视力模糊或变暗评分相关(0.3[0.7]与 0.1[0.3]和 0.0[0.2];P=0.02)。滴注后立即进行最佳矫正 ETDRS 视力的平均得分显著低于噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐(49.6[8.4]与 53.0[6.1]和 53.1[6.7];P=0.007)。3 种治疗方法之间的 24 小时平均谷眼压差异无显著差异。

结论

在这项比较青光眼和/或高眼压症患者单剂量噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%和噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%的症状和耐受性的先导研究中,短期(3 天)使用马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐治疗与噻吗洛尔半水合物和噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液相比,更易引起刺痛或烧灼感。与噻吗洛尔半水合物和马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐相比,噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液在滴注后更易引起视力模糊或变暗。

相似文献

1
Short-term tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension: a prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, three-period crossover pilot study.每日一次噻吗洛尔半水合物 0.5%、马来酸噻吗洛尔山梨酸盐 0.5%和通用马来酸噻吗洛尔凝胶形成溶液 0.5%在青光眼和/或高眼压症中的短期耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、阳性对照、三周期交叉先导研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2063-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.003.
2
A randomized, investigator-masked, 4-week study comparing timolol maleate 0.5%, brinzolamide 1%, and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% as adjunctive therapies to travoprost 0.004% in adults with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.一项随机、研究者设盲的4周研究,比较0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔、1%布林佐胺和0.2%酒石酸溴莫尼定作为0.004%曲伏前列素辅助治疗药物,用于治疗原发性开角型青光眼或高眼压症成人患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2006 Apr;28(4):552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.007.
3
Efficacy and safety of timolol solution once daily versus timolol gel in treating elevated intraocular pressure.噻吗洛尔溶液每日一次与噻吗洛尔凝胶治疗眼压升高的疗效和安全性比较
J Glaucoma. 1998 Dec;7(6):402-7.
4
[Efficacy and safety of long-acting carteolol 1% once daily. A double-masked, randomized study].[1%长效卡替洛尔每日一次的疗效与安全性。一项双盲随机研究]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Feb;26(2):131-6.
5
24-Hour IOP control with once-daily bimatoprost, timolol gel-forming solution, or latanoprost: a 1-month, randomized, comparative clinical trial.使用每日一次的比马前列素、噻吗洛尔凝胶剂或拉坦前列素进行24小时眼压控制:一项为期1个月的随机对照临床试验。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;49 Suppl 1:S26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.12.017.
6
Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.在高眼压症或开角型青光眼患者中,患者对马来酸噻吗洛尔眼用凝胶剂与马来酸噻吗洛尔滴眼液的偏好、疗效及依从性比较
Clin Ther. 1999 Jan;21(1):138-47. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88274-0.
7
Switching from latanoprost to fixed-combination latanoprost-timolol: a 21-day, randomized, double-masked, active-control study in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.从拉坦前列素转换为拉坦前列素-噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂:一项针对青光眼和高眼压症患者的为期21天的随机、双盲、活性对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2004 Oct;26(10):1619-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.10.009.
8
The efficacy and safety of dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy to timolol maleate gellan solution in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Additivity Study Group.多佐胺作为马来酸噻吗洛尔结冷胶溶液辅助治疗对眼压升高患者的疗效和安全性。相加性研究组。
J Glaucoma. 1998 Aug;7(4):253-60.
9
A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.一项为期6周的双盲平行组研究,比较0.004%曲伏前列素与0.005%拉坦前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔治疗原发性开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2006 Mar;28(3):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.001.
10
Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4.比马前列素降低青光眼和高眼压症患者眼压的长期疗效及安全性:第4年
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;92(10):1387-92. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.128454. Epub 2008 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comfort Survey of Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5% Solution Once or Twice Daily vs Timolol Maleate in Sorbate.噻吗洛尔半水合物0.5%溶液每日一次或两次与山梨酸中马来酸噻吗洛尔的舒适度调查
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2013 Jan-Apr;7(1):11-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1130. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
2
Glaucoma management: relative value and place in therapy of available drug treatments.青光眼的治疗:现有药物治疗的相对价值及在治疗中的地位。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan;5(1):30-43. doi: 10.1177/2040622313511286.