Department of Ophthalmology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, and * Optics and Visual Assessment Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis, California, U. S. A.
J Glaucoma. 1994 Summer;3 Suppl 1:S73-81.
This article summarizes some previous and ongoing research on the optimization of test strategies in automated perimetry for both the detection and the evaluation of glaucomatous visual field damage. A variety of methods, ranging from a large screening program to computer simulation, were employed to investigate the performance of different test strategies. We detail methods to optimize the number and distribution of test locations for visual field screening and show that effective screening programs can be designed with as few as 20 test locations. Computer-simulation experiments in threshold perimetry were done using empirical models for both the normal and glaucomatous visual field. We evaluated the test performance of the 30-2 program of the Humphrey Field Analyzer in estimating the thresholds in 50 normal and 50 glaucomatous visual fields. We also studied the interaction between various thresholding strategies and the number of test locations in the visual field to decide how clinical visual field information can be obtained most accurately and efficiently.
本文总结了一些先前和正在进行的研究,旨在优化自动化视野计中的测试策略,以用于青光眼视野损伤的检测和评估。研究采用了从大型筛查计划到计算机模拟等各种方法,以研究不同测试策略的性能。我们详细介绍了优化视野筛查测试位置数量和分布的方法,并表明可以用少至 20 个测试位置设计有效的筛查程序。我们使用正常和青光眼视野的经验模型在阈值视野计中进行了计算机模拟实验。我们评估了 Humphrey 视野分析仪的 30-2 程序在估计 50 个正常和 50 个青光眼视野的阈值方面的测试性能。我们还研究了各种阈值策略和视野中测试位置数量之间的相互作用,以确定如何最准确和有效地获得临床视野信息。