• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 FAME 分析的表型微生物溯源中指示生物选择和文库大小的考虑因素。

Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.

机构信息

Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA 19085, USA.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2009;60(10):2659-68. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.656.

DOI:10.2166/wst.2009.656
PMID:19923772
Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effects of choice of the indicator organisms on the accuracy of classifying the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of the known-source library isolates. First, a known-source library containing the FAME profiles of Enterococcus isolates cultured from six different possible sources of microbial pollution was developed. A total of 511 Enterococcus isolates were profiled: 120 isolates from sewage samples representing humans; 69 from dairy and cattle cow; 74 from chicken; 76 from swine; 94 from deer; and 78 from waterfowl. Classification of known-source Enterococcus isolates into their respective host categories resulted with a 66% average rate of correct classification (ARCC) in a six-way discriminant analysis (DA). The ARCC increased to 75% when the individual hosts were pooled into larger categories of human, livestock, and wildlife. The accuracy was 80% when isolates of human origin were discriminated against those of non-human origins. Recently, several studies reported the ARCCs for various classification schemes associated with total coliform (TC), fecal coliform (FC), and Escherichia coli of the known-source isolates. When the accuracy of classification of Enterococcus isolates was compared to those reported for TC, FC, and E. coli isolates, the lowest ARCCs were associated with classification of E. coli isolates, the only species level indicator organism among the four compared. It was found that the degree of discrimination increases as the indicator becomes more inclusive of bacteria from different genus. In addition, random cluster formation analysis indicates that known-source libraries with isolate numbers between 300 and 500 might be sufficient for MST by FAME.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是探讨选择指示生物对分类已知来源文库分离物脂肪酸甲酯 (FAME) 图谱准确性的影响。首先,开发了一个包含 6 种不同微生物污染来源的粪肠球菌 FAME 图谱的已知来源文库。共对 511 个粪肠球菌分离物进行了分析:120 个来自人类污水样本;69 个来自奶牛和牛;74 个来自鸡;76 个来自猪;94 个来自鹿;78 个来自水禽。将已知来源的粪肠球菌分离物按其各自的宿主类别分类,在 6 向判别分析 (DA) 中平均正确分类率 (ARCC) 为 66%。当将个体宿主归入更大的人类、家畜和野生动物类别时,ARCC 增加到 75%。当将人类来源的分离物与非人类来源的分离物区分开来时,准确性达到 80%。最近,有几项研究报告了与总大肠菌群 (TC)、粪大肠菌群 (FC) 和已知来源分离物的大肠杆菌相关的各种分类方案的 ARCC。当将粪肠球菌分离物的分类准确性与 TC、FC 和大肠杆菌分离物的报告进行比较时,与大肠杆菌分离物相关的 ARCC 最低,大肠杆菌是这四种比较的指示生物中唯一的种水平指示生物。结果发现,随着指示生物对不同属细菌的包容性增加,区分度增加。此外,随机聚类分析表明,对于 MST 而言,具有 300 到 500 个分离物数量的已知来源文库可能就足够了。

相似文献

1
Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.基于 FAME 分析的表型微生物溯源中指示生物选择和文库大小的考虑因素。
Water Sci Technol. 2009;60(10):2659-68. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.656.
2
Phenotypic characterization of Escherichia coli through whole-cell fatty acid profiling to investigate host specificity.通过全细胞脂肪酸谱分析对大肠杆菌进行表型特征分析以研究宿主特异性。
Water Res. 2007 Feb;41(4):803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.041. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
3
Microbial source tracking using host specific FAME profiles of fecal coliforms.利用粪便大肠菌群的宿主特异性脂肪酸甲酯(FAME)谱进行微生物源追踪。
Water Res. 2006 Jan;40(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.019. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
4
Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.评估抗生素抗性分析和核糖体分型用于识别城市流域粪便污染源的情况。
J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(3):618-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02612.x.
5
Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.以牛为主导的农村流域中的微生物源追踪
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3729-39. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.020. Epub 2007 May 1.
6
Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.基于表型文库的微生物源追踪方法:加利福尼亚合作研究中的效能
J Water Health. 2003 Dec;1(4):153-66.
7
Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.细菌源追踪的准确性:大肠杆菌与肠球菌属以及尽量减少非文库来源分离株的归属
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Feb;102(2):591-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03077.x.
8
Discriminant analysis of fecal bacterial species composition for use as a phenotypic microbial source tracking method.粪便细菌物种组成的判别分析用作表型微生物源追踪方法。
Res Microbiol. 2006 Jun;157(5):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.012. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
9
Carbon source utilization profiles as a method to identify sources of faecal pollution in water.利用碳源利用图谱作为识别水中粪便污染来源的一种方法。
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(5):792-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01804.x.
10
Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.四种细菌溯源方法的直接比较及复合数据集的使用
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Aug;103(2):350-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03246.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward Forensic Uses of Microbial Source Tracking.用于法医的微生物溯源技术
Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.EMF-0014-2017.
2
Identification of fecal input sites in spring water by selection and genotyping of multiresistant Escherichia coli.通过选择和基因分型多耐药大肠杆菌鉴定泉水的粪便来源。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Dec;77(23):8427-33. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05651-11. Epub 2011 Sep 30.