• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用粪便大肠菌群的宿主特异性脂肪酸甲酯(FAME)谱进行微生物源追踪。

Microbial source tracking using host specific FAME profiles of fecal coliforms.

作者信息

Duran Metin, Haznedaroğlu Berat Z, Zitomer Daniel H

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19010, USA.

出版信息

Water Res. 2006 Jan;40(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.019. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.019
PMID:16360192
Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the host-specific differences in fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of fecal coliforms (FC). A known-source library was constructed with 314 FC isolates cultured from 6 possible sources of fecal pollution; 99 isolates from sewage; 29 from bovine; 29 from poultry; 50 from swine; 46 from waterfowl; and 61 from deer. It was found that the hydroxy FAMEs 12:0 2 OH, 12:03 OH, and 14:02 OH were exclusively associated with isolates of human origin. On the other hand, 3 saturated FAMEs, 10:0, 15:0, and 18:0 were found only in isolates from non-human sources, 15:0 being associated with livestock samples only. In addition to the presence of these signature FAMEs, the mean relative masses of 16:1 omega7c and 16:1 ISO/14:03 OH were significantly different between the isolates of human and non-human origins. A linear discriminant function differentiated FC isolates of human origin from those of livestock and wildlife origin at 99% accuracy. These results strongly suggest that the FAME profiles of FC show statistically significant host specificity and may have the potential to be used as a phenotypic microbial source tracking tool.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查粪大肠菌群(FC)脂肪酸甲酯(FAME)谱的宿主特异性差异。构建了一个已知来源文库,其中包含从6种可能的粪便污染源培养的314株FC分离株;99株来自污水;29株来自牛;29株来自家禽;50株来自猪;46株来自水禽;61株来自鹿。研究发现,羟基FAMEs 12:0 2 OH、12:0 3 OH和14:0 2 OH仅与人类来源的分离株相关。另一方面,3种饱和FAMEs,10:0、15:0和18:0仅在非人类来源的分离株中发现,15:0仅与家畜样本相关。除了这些特征性FAMEs的存在外,人类和非人类来源分离株中16:1 omega7c和16:1 ISO/14:0 3 OH的平均相对质量也存在显著差异。线性判别函数以99%的准确率区分人类来源的FC分离株与家畜和野生动物来源的分离株。这些结果有力地表明,FC的FAME谱具有统计学上显著的宿主特异性,可能有潜力用作表型微生物源追踪工具。

相似文献

1
Microbial source tracking using host specific FAME profiles of fecal coliforms.利用粪便大肠菌群的宿主特异性脂肪酸甲酯(FAME)谱进行微生物源追踪。
Water Res. 2006 Jan;40(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.019. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
2
Phenotypic characterization of Escherichia coli through whole-cell fatty acid profiling to investigate host specificity.通过全细胞脂肪酸谱分析对大肠杆菌进行表型特征分析以研究宿主特异性。
Water Res. 2007 Feb;41(4):803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.041. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
3
Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.基于 FAME 分析的表型微生物溯源中指示生物选择和文库大小的考虑因素。
Water Sci Technol. 2009;60(10):2659-68. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.656.
4
Discriminant analysis of fecal bacterial species composition for use as a phenotypic microbial source tracking method.粪便细菌物种组成的判别分析用作表型微生物源追踪方法。
Res Microbiol. 2006 Jun;157(5):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.012. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
5
Microbial source tracking by DNA sequence analysis of the Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase gene.通过大肠杆菌苹果酸脱氢酶基因的DNA序列分析进行微生物源追踪
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Dec;67(3):507-26. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.026. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
6
Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays.利用宿主特异性拟杆菌检测法确定肯尼亚粪便污染的人类和牲畜来源。
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4956-66. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.028. Epub 2009 Jul 26.
7
Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.以牛为主导的农村流域中的微生物源追踪
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3729-39. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.020. Epub 2007 May 1.
8
Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.基于表型文库的微生物源追踪方法:加利福尼亚合作研究中的效能
J Water Health. 2003 Dec;1(4):153-66.
9
Source specific fecal bacteria modeling using soil and water assessment tool model.使用土壤和水评估工具模型进行源特异性粪便细菌建模。
Bioresour Technol. 2009 Jan;100(2):953-63. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.045. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
10
Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.评估宿主特异性拟杆菌目16S rRNA基因标记作为检测草原流域粪便污染的补充工具。
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4838-49. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.045. Epub 2009 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic analysis of phylogroup D Escherichia coli strains using novel de-novo reference-based guided assembly.利用新型基于从头参考的引导组装对进化枝 D 型大肠杆菌菌株进行基因组分析。
Sci Data. 2023 Sep 1;10(1):573. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02444-0.
2
Evaluating the Bacterial Diversity from the Southwest Coast of India Using Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Profiles.采用脂肪酸甲酯图谱分析印度西南海岸的细菌多样性。
Curr Microbiol. 2021 Feb;78(2):649-658. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02315-6. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Identification of Faecal Maternal Semiochemicals in Swine (Sus scrofa) and their Effects on Weaned Piglets.
粪便中母体信息素在猪(Sus scrofa)中的鉴定及其对断奶仔猪的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62280-9.
4
1,3-Dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin as a Precatalyst for Activation of Carbonyl Functionality.1,3-二溴-5,5-二甲基乙内酰脲作为一种羰基功能活化的前催化剂。
Molecules. 2019 Jul 17;24(14):2608. doi: 10.3390/molecules24142608.
5
Worldwide Phylogenetic Group Patterns of from Commensal Human and Wastewater Treatment Plant Isolates.来自人类共生菌和污水处理厂分离株的全球系统发育群模式。
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 21;8:2512. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02512. eCollection 2017.
6
A comparative study of coastal and clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.铜绿假单胞菌沿海分离株与临床分离株的比较研究。
Braz J Microbiol. 2015 Jul 1;46(3):725-34. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246320140502. eCollection 2015 Jul-Sep.
7
PLFA analyses of microbial communities associated with PAH-contaminated riverbank sediment.与多环芳烃污染河岸沉积物相关的微生物群落的 PLFA 分析。
Microb Ecol. 2012 Oct;64(3):680-91. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0060-8. Epub 2012 May 15.