• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

VERITAS-Pro:一种评估血友病预防治疗方案依从性的新方法。

VERITAS-Pro: a new measure of adherence to prophylactic regimens in haemophilia.

机构信息

Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Indianapolis, IN 46260, USA.

出版信息

Haemophilia. 2010 Mar;16(2):247-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02129.x. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02129.x
PMID:19925631
Abstract

Prophylactic treatment is recommended for severe haemophilia. Non-adherence to a prophylactic regimen can limit treatment effectiveness and compromise outcomes. The aim of this study is to validate a new prophylactic treatment adherence scale entitled Validated Hemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale--Prophylaxis (VERITAS-Pro), a self-/parent-report questionnaire consisting of 24 questions on six (four-item) subscales (Time, Dose, Plan, Remember, Skip, Communicate) that takes approximately 10 min to complete and is currently available in English only. Participants were recruited to complete the VERITAS-Pro for validation and reliability analysis; and observers were recruited for inter-rater reliability analysis. Validation measures included subjective adherence ratings from participants and providers and the total number of recommended infusions administered as obtained from infusion logs. Data were evaluated for the entire sample and for parent-report and self-report subsamples. The study sample included 67 males, 53 (79.1%) diagnosed with severe FVIII deficiency. Internal consistency for the total VERITAS-Pro score and all subscales was good to excellent; test-retest reliability correlations were very strong. Validation measures were strongly correlated with VERITAS-Pro scores. The VERITAS-Pro is a reliable and valid measure of adherence to prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. The VERITAS-Pro has greater utility than a global or informal rating of adherence because it represents a quantified and validated measure of adherence from the patient's perspective and it divides adherence into specific areas, allowing insight into particular issues underlying non-adherence. This tool may increase sensitivity to adherence problems and allow more targeted interventions to enhance adherence.

摘要

预防性治疗推荐用于重度血友病。不遵守预防性治疗方案可能会限制治疗效果并影响治疗结果。本研究旨在验证一种新的预防性治疗依从性量表,名为经验证的血友病治疗依从性量表-预防(VERITAS-Pro),这是一种自我/家长报告问卷,包含 6 个(4 项)分量表的 24 个问题(时间、剂量、计划、记忆、遗漏、沟通),大约需要 10 分钟完成,目前仅提供英文版本。参与者被招募来完成 VERITAS-Pro 进行验证和可靠性分析;观察人员被招募进行评分者间信度分析。验证措施包括参与者和提供者的主观依从性评分,以及从输注日志中获得的推荐输注次数。对整个样本以及家长报告和自我报告子样本进行了数据评估。研究样本包括 67 名男性,其中 53 名(79.1%)被诊断为严重 FVIII 缺乏症。VERITAS-Pro 总分和所有分量表的内部一致性良好到优秀;重测信度相关性非常强。验证措施与 VERITAS-Pro 评分呈强相关。VERITAS-Pro 是一种可靠有效的评估血友病预防性治疗依从性的工具。VERITAS-Pro 比整体或非正式的依从性评分更具实用性,因为它代表了患者视角的量化和验证的依从性衡量标准,并且将依从性分为特定领域,深入了解不依从的特定问题。该工具可以提高对依从性问题的敏感性,并允许进行更有针对性的干预措施来提高依从性。

相似文献

1
VERITAS-Pro: a new measure of adherence to prophylactic regimens in haemophilia.VERITAS-Pro:一种评估血友病预防治疗方案依从性的新方法。
Haemophilia. 2010 Mar;16(2):247-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02129.x. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
2
VERITAS-PRN: a new measure of adherence to episodic treatment regimens in haemophilia.VERITAS-PRN:一种评估血友病间歇性治疗方案依从性的新方法。
Haemophilia. 2010 Jan;16(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02094.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
3
Adherence to treatment in a Western European paediatric population with haemophilia: reliability and validity of the VERITAS-Pro scale.西欧血友病儿科人群的治疗依从性:VERITAS-Pro量表的信度和效度
Haemophilia. 2014 Sep;20(5):616-23. doi: 10.1111/hae.12463. Epub 2014 May 26.
4
Validation of the Brazilian version of the VERITAS-Pro scale to assess adherence to prophylactic regimens in hemophilia.用于评估血友病预防性治疗方案依从性的巴西版VERITAS-Pro量表的验证
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2018 Jan-Mar;40(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
5
Adherence to prophylaxis is associated with better outcomes in moderate and severe haemophilia: results of a patient survey.坚持预防治疗与中重度血友病患者更好的治疗效果相关:一项患者调查结果
Haemophilia. 2015 Jan;21(1):64-70. doi: 10.1111/hae.12533. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
6
Adherence to prophylactic treatment in patients with haemophilia in Germany.德国血友病患者预防性治疗的依从性。
Haemophilia. 2016 Sep;22(5):e367-74. doi: 10.1111/hae.13003. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Better adherence to prescribed treatment regimen is related to less chronic pain among adolescents and young adults with moderate or severe haemophilia.在患有中度或重度血友病的青少年和年轻人中,更好地坚持规定的治疗方案与较少的慢性疼痛有关。
Haemophilia. 2014 Jul;20(4):506-12. doi: 10.1111/hae.12360. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
8
An objective method for assessing adherence to prophylaxis in adults with severe haemophilia.一种评估成人重型血友病患者预防治疗依从性的客观方法。
Haemophilia. 2014 Jan;20(1):39-43. doi: 10.1111/hae.12235. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Adherence to Prophylaxis in Adolescents and Young Adults with Severe Haemophilia: A Quantitative Study with Patients.青少年和青年重型血友病患者预防治疗的依从性:一项针对患者的定量研究
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0169880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169880. eCollection 2017.
10
Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey.美国甲型血友病和乙型血友病的治疗趋势:来自 2010 年实践模式调查的结果。
Haemophilia. 2012 May;18(3):e140-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02770.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Centred Management of Well-Controlled Haemophilia: Obtaining Opinions and Definitions Through a Delphi Consensus.以患者为中心的血友病良好控制管理:通过德尔菲共识获得意见和定义
J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3300. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103300.
2
Concizumab prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A or B without inhibitors: patient-reported outcome results from the phase 3 explorer8 study.在无抑制物的甲型或乙型血友病患者中使用 concizumab 进行预防:3 期探索者 8 研究的患者报告结局结果
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Feb 20;9(2):102705. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102705. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Systematic Literature Review of Outcomes Associated With Adherence to Haemophilia Drug Therapy.
血友病药物治疗依从性相关结局的系统文献综述
Haemophilia. 2025 Mar;31(2):187-206. doi: 10.1111/hae.15153. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Adherence and Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B and Von Willebrand Disease: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.成年甲型血友病、乙型血友病和血管性血友病患者的治疗依从性与生活质量:一项全国性横断面调查。
Eur J Haematol. 2025 Jan;114(1):164-172. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14324. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
5
Development and validation of the Child Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure: A new observer-reported outcome measure.儿童血友病治疗体验量表的开发与验证:一种新的观察者报告结局指标
Haemophilia. 2025 Jan;31(1):48-62. doi: 10.1111/hae.15102. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
Concizumab prophylaxis in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors: patient-reported outcome results from the phase 3 explorer7 study.在患有血友病A或B且有抑制剂的患者中使用concizumab进行预防:3期探索者7研究的患者报告结局结果
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Jun 17;8(4):102476. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102476. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Changes in Quality of Life, Adherence, and Kinesiophobia in Patients with Hemophilia Treated with Extended Half-Life Treatment: Final Results of the LongHest Project.接受延长半衰期治疗的血友病患者的生活质量、依从性和运动恐惧的变化:LongHest项目的最终结果
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jun 25;17(7):835. doi: 10.3390/ph17070835.
8
Adherence to hemophilia patients with prophylaxis: Veritas-Pro and psychometric properties adapted to Turkish.接受预防性治疗的血友病患者的依从性:Veritas-Pro 及其适用于土耳其的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0288625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288625. eCollection 2023.
9
Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM).理解血友病的治疗负担:血友病治疗体验量表(Hemo-TEM)的开发和验证。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Feb 23;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6.
10
Adherence to prophylaxis and bleeding outcome: A multicenter Nigerian study.抗凝治疗的依从性与出血结局:一项多中心的尼日利亚研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0264600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264600. eCollection 2023.