Suppr超能文献

研究评估指南:1. 研究的本质

A guide to the appraisal of research: 1. The nature of research.

作者信息

Bateman Geoff, Burke F J Trevor, Saha Shuva

机构信息

University of Birmingham Dental Hospital and School, St. Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK.

出版信息

Dent Update. 2009 Oct;36(8):495-6, 498-501. doi: 10.12968/denu.2009.36.8.495.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Evidence-based dentistry has grown in recent years. The oceans of journals and research papers can be difficult to navigate. Gauging the quality of such publications and, more importantly, their clinical relevance may be challenging.This narrative review explores the nature and relevance of dental research to clinical dentistry and provides simple guidelines for critical appraisal of such research. In this respect, all dental clinical practice should be underpinned, where possible, with evidence that treatments carried out are contemporary and effective.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A working knowledge of dental research and its relevance to clinical practice should allow practitioners to select best evidence to inform their clinical practice.

摘要

未标注

循证牙科近年来不断发展。浩如烟海的期刊和研究论文让人难以梳理。评估此类出版物的质量,更重要的是评估其临床相关性,可能具有挑战性。本叙述性综述探讨了牙科研究的性质及其与临床牙科的相关性,并为批判性评价此类研究提供了简单指南。在这方面,所有牙科临床实践都应尽可能以证据为基础,证明所实施的治疗是现代的且有效的。

临床相关性

掌握牙科研究及其与临床实践的相关性,应能使从业者选择最佳证据来指导临床实践。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验