Meguid Robert A, Hooker Craig M, Taylor Joshua T, Kleinberg Laurence R, Cattaneo Stephen M, Sussman Marc S, Yang Stephen C, Heitmiller Richard F, Forastiere Arlene A, Brock Malcolm V
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;138(6):1309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.069.
We hypothesized that most relapses in patients with esophageal cancer having neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy would occur outside of the surgical and radiation fields.
Recurrence patterns, time to recurrence, and median survival were examined in 267 patients who had esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy at Johns Hopkins over 19 years.
Of 267 patients, 82 (30.7%) showed complete response to neoadjuvant therapy, with 108 (40.4%) and 77 (28.8%) showing partial response or no response, respectively. Recurrence developed in 84 patients (patients with complete response 18/82, 21.4%; patients with partial response 39/108, 36.1%; patients with no response 27/77, 35.1%; P = .055, respectively). Most patients had recurrences at distant sites (65/84;77.4%) regardless of pathologic response, and subsequent survival was brief (median 8.37 months). Median disease-free survival was short (10 months) and did not differ based on recurrence site for patients with partial response or no response, but was longer for patients with complete response with distant recurrence, whose median disease-free survival was 27.3 months (P = .008). By multivariate analysis, no other factor except for pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy was associated with disease recurrence or death. Patients with partial response or no response were 1.97 and 2.23 times more likely to have recurrence than patients with complete response (P = .024 and P = .012, respectively).
Most esophageal cancer recurrences after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery are distant, and survival time after recurrence is short regardless of pathologic response. Fewer patients achieving complete response had recurrences, and distant recurrences in these patients manifest later than in patients showing partial response and those showing no response. Only pathologic response is significantly associated with disease recurrence, suggesting that tumor biology and chemosensitivity are critical in long-term patient outcome.
我们推测,接受新辅助放化疗的食管癌患者的大多数复发会发生在手术和放疗区域之外。
对约翰·霍普金斯医院19年间接受新辅助放化疗后行食管切除术的267例患者的复发模式、复发时间和中位生存期进行了研究。
267例患者中,82例(30.7%)对新辅助治疗显示完全缓解,108例(40.4%)和77例(28.8%)分别显示部分缓解或无缓解。84例患者出现复发(完全缓解患者18/82,21.4%;部分缓解患者39/108,36.1%;无缓解患者27/77,35.1%;P = 0.055)。无论病理反应如何,大多数患者在远处部位复发(65/84;77.4%),随后生存期较短(中位生存期8.37个月)。无病生存期中位数较短(10个月),部分缓解或无缓解患者的无病生存期根据复发部位无差异,但完全缓解且远处复发患者的无病生存期较长,其无病生存期中位数为27.3个月(P = 0.008)。多因素分析显示,除对新辅助治疗的病理反应外,无其他因素与疾病复发或死亡相关。部分缓解或无缓解的患者复发的可能性分别是完全缓解患者的1.97倍和2.23倍(P分别为0.024和0.012)。
新辅助治疗和手术后,大多数食管癌复发发生在远处,无论病理反应如何,复发后的生存时间都很短。达到完全缓解的患者复发较少,这些患者的远处复发比部分缓解和无缓解的患者出现得晚。只有病理反应与疾病复发显著相关,这表明肿瘤生物学和化疗敏感性对患者的长期预后至关重要。