Suppr超能文献

新辅助放化疗与单纯化疗用于接受食管癌切除术的患者的比较。

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy for patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Luu Theresa D, Gaur Puja, Force Seth D, Staley Charles A, Mansour Kamal A, Miller Joseph I, Miller Daniel L

机构信息

Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1217-23; discussion 1223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.070.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy is currently the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer. This intense preoperative regimen delays definitive resection and increases perioperative risks. With the improvement of chemotherapy agents, chemotherapy alone may be better suited for patients awaiting esophagectomy because of shorter preoperative treatment time and less associated perioperative complications. No recent study has compared chemoradiation to chemotherapy alone before esophageal resection with respect to operative morbidity and mortality and overall survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients (281) who underwent an esophagectomy for cancer at our institution from July 1995 through June 2005; 122 patients (43%) had neoadjuvant treatment and form the basis of this study.

RESULTS

Preoperative chemoradiation (CR) was administered in 64 patients and chemotherapy only (CO) in 58 patients. Operative mortality was 6% (4 patients) in the CR group and 0% in the CO group (p = 0.12). Overall postoperative complications rate was 48% in CR patients and 33% in CO patients (p = 0.09). Complete pathologic response occurred in 11 CR patients (17%) and in 2 CO patients (4%; p = 0.02). There was no difference in recurrences between the two groups (p = 0.43). Median survival was 17 months in the CR patients and 21 months in the CO patients (p = 0.14). One-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 76%, 46%, and 41%, respectively, in the CR patients and 70%, 40%, and 31%, respectively, in the CO patients (p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation resulted in a significantly better complete pathologic response rate when compared with chemotherapy alone, that did not translate into a long-term survival advantage. Chemotherapy alone may be the preferred neoadjuvant modality to expedite resection, decrease operative mortality and postoperative complications, and improve survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

摘要

背景

新辅助放化疗后行食管切除术目前是局部晚期食管癌的标准治疗方案。这种强烈的术前治疗方案会延迟确定性切除并增加围手术期风险。随着化疗药物的改进,单纯化疗可能更适合等待食管切除术的患者,因为术前治疗时间较短且围手术期相关并发症较少。最近没有研究比较食管切除术前放化疗与单纯化疗在手术发病率、死亡率及总生存率方面的差异。

方法

对1995年7月至2005年6月在本机构接受食管癌食管切除术的所有患者(281例)进行回顾性分析;122例患者(43%)接受了新辅助治疗并构成了本研究的基础。

结果

64例患者接受了术前放化疗(CR),58例患者仅接受了化疗(CO)。CR组手术死亡率为6%(4例患者),CO组为0%(p = 0.12)。CR组患者术后总体并发症发生率为48%,CO组为33%(p = 0.09)。11例CR患者(17%)和2例CO患者(4%;p = 0.02)出现了完全病理缓解。两组复发情况无差异(p = 0.43)。CR组患者的中位生存期为17个月,CO组为21个月(p = 0.14)。CR组患者1年、3年和5年生存率分别为76%、46%和41%,CO组分别为70%、40%和31%(p = 0.31)。

结论

虽然与单纯化疗相比,新辅助放化疗导致完全病理缓解率显著更高,但这并未转化为长期生存优势。单纯化疗可能是局部晚期食管癌患者加快切除、降低手术死亡率和术后并发症并改善生存的首选新辅助治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验