Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jul;124(1-2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
Research examining the course of depressive symptoms during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is relatively scarce.
To classify patients according to the course of their depressive symptoms while receiving ECT.
The sample consisted of 156 consecutive patients receiving ECT for unipolar depressive disorder. Depressive symptoms were measured weekly with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Latent class analysis was applied to identify distinct trajectories of symptom improvement.
We identified five classes of different trajectories (improvement rates) of depressive symptoms, i.e. fast improvement (39 patients), intermediate improvement (47 patients), slow improvement (30 patients), slow improvement with delayed onset (18 patients), and finally a trajectory with no improvement (20 patients). The course of depressive symptoms at the end of the treatment within the trajectories of intermediate improvement, slow improvement and slow improvement with delayed onset, was still improving and did not achieve a plateau.
The different courses of depressive symptoms during ECT probably contribute to mixed results of prediction studies of ECT outcome. Data suggest that for a large group of patients no optimal clinical endpoint can be identified, other than full remission or no improvement at all, to discontinue ECT.
研究电抽搐治疗(ECT)期间抑郁症状的过程相对较少。
根据接受 ECT 时抑郁症状的过程对患者进行分类。
该样本由 156 名连续接受 ECT 治疗的单相抑郁障碍患者组成。每周使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表测量抑郁症状。应用潜在类别分析来确定症状改善的不同轨迹。
我们确定了抑郁症状不同轨迹(改善率)的五类,即快速改善(39 例)、中等改善(47 例)、缓慢改善(30 例)、缓慢改善伴迟发(18 例)和最后无改善(20 例)。在中等改善、缓慢改善和缓慢改善伴迟发的轨迹中,治疗结束时的抑郁症状仍在改善,并未达到平台期。
ECT 期间抑郁症状的不同过程可能导致 ECT 结果预测研究的结果存在差异。数据表明,对于大多数患者,除了完全缓解或根本没有改善之外,无法确定停止 ECT 的最佳临床终点。