Mood, Depression, and Suicidal Behavior Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):287-95. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04621blu. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
To investigate the categorical and dimensional temporal stability of Axis II personality disorders among depressive patients, and to determine whether variations in Axis I comorbid disorders or self-reported personality traits predict changes in researcher-assigned personality disorder symptoms.
Patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder (MDD) in the Vantaa Depression Study (N = 269) were interviewed with the World Health Organization Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, version 2.0, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis II Disorders and were assessed with the 57-item Eysenck Personality Inventory at baseline, 6 months, and 18 months. Baseline interviews occurred between February 1, 1997, and May 31, 1998; follow-up interviews were 6 months and 18 months after baseline for each patient. Of the patients included in the study, 193 remained unipolar and could be interviewed at both follow-ups. The covariation of the severity of depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and reported neuroticism and extraversion with assigned personality disorder symptoms was investigated by using general estimation equations.
The diagnosis of personality disorder persisted at all time points in about half (43%) of the 81 MDD patients diagnosed with personality disorder at baseline. The number of positive personality disorder criteria declined, particularly during the first 6 months, by a mean of 3 criteria. The decline in reported personality disorder symptoms covaried significantly with declines in the severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms (depressive: P = .02 for paranoid, P = .02 for borderline, and P = .01 for avoidant; anxiety: P = .08 for paranoid, P = .01 for borderline, and P < .001 for avoidant). Changes in patients' perceptions of self as measured by neuroticism covaried with changes in paranoid (P = .01) and borderline (P < .001) personality disorder symptoms.
Among MDD patients, the categorical stability of concurrent personality disorder diagnoses assigned while depressed is relatively poor, but the dimensional stability is moderate. The remission of depression as well as variations in Axis I comorbidity, particularly anxiety disorders, influences personality disorder diagnoses. These diagnostic difficulties most likely reflect broader variations in patients' perceptions of self over time, not merely psychometric problems related to the pertinent diagnostic criteria.
研究抑郁患者中轴 II 人格障碍的类别和维度时间稳定性,并确定轴 I 共病障碍或自我报告的人格特征的变化是否预测研究者分配的人格障碍症状的变化。
在万塔抑郁研究(N = 269)中,符合 DSM-IV 重性抑郁障碍(MDD)标准的患者接受世界卫生组织神经精神病临床评估时间表 2.0 版和 DSM-III-R 轴 II 障碍的结构性临床访谈的访谈,并在基线、6 个月和 18 个月时使用 57 项艾森克人格问卷进行评估。基线访谈于 1997 年 2 月 1 日至 1998 年 5 月 31 日进行;每位患者的随访访谈在基线后 6 个月和 18 个月进行。在研究中纳入的患者中,193 例为单相抑郁患者,可在两次随访中接受访谈。通过使用一般估计方程研究抑郁、焦虑、酒精使用和报告的神经质和外向性的严重程度与分配的人格障碍症状的协变量。
在基线时诊断为人格障碍的 81 例 MDD 患者中,约一半(43%)在所有时间点均保留人格障碍的诊断。阳性人格障碍标准的数量减少,特别是在最初的 6 个月内,平均减少 3 项。报告的人格障碍症状的下降与抑郁和焦虑症状严重程度的下降显著相关(抑郁:偏执型 P =.02,边缘型 P =.02,回避型 P =.01;焦虑:偏执型 P =.08,边缘型 P =.01,回避型 P <.001)。神经质测量的患者自我感知的变化与偏执型(P =.01)和边缘型(P <.001)人格障碍症状的变化相关。
在 MDD 患者中,抑郁时同时诊断的人格障碍的类别稳定性相对较差,但维度稳定性中等。抑郁的缓解以及轴 I 共病的变化,特别是焦虑障碍,会影响人格障碍的诊断。这些诊断困难很可能反映了患者自我感知随时间的广泛变化,而不仅仅是与相关诊断标准相关的心理测量问题。