School of Human Life Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250 Australia.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jan;55(1):88-99. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.025. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
Hemodialysis patients show reduced physical function and greater risk of increased arterial stiffness because of hypertension, metabolic disturbances, and vascular calcification. Exercise interventions potentially could improve their vascular risk profile.
Randomized controlled pilot clinical study comparing the effects of 6 months of supervised intradialytic exercise training versus home-based exercise training or usual care on physical function and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 70 hemodialysis patients from 3 renal units.
Intradialytic-exercise patients trained 3 times/wk for 6 months on a cycle ergometer and home-based-exercise patients followed a walking program to achieve the same weekly physical activity. Usual-care patients received no specific intervention.
OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measures were distance traveled during a 6-minute walk test and aortic pulse wave velocity. Secondary outcome measures included augmentation index (augmentation pressure as a percentage of central pulse pressure), peripheral (brachial) and central blood pressures (measured noninvasively using radial tonometry), physical activity, and self-reported physical functioning. Measurements were made at baseline and 6 months.
At 6 months, there were no significant differences between changes in 6-minute walk test distance (intradialytic exercise, +14%; home-based exercise, +11%; usual care, +5%), pulse wave velocity (intradialytic exercise, -4%; home-based exercise, -2%; usual care, +5%), or any secondary outcome measure.
Lack of medication data limited the analysis of vascular parameters in this study.
There were no differences between intradialytic or home-based exercise training and usual care for either physical function or vascular parameters.
由于高血压、代谢紊乱和血管钙化,血液透析患者的身体功能下降,动脉僵硬风险增加。运动干预可能改善他们的血管风险状况。
一项比较 6 个月监督性血液透析内运动训练与家庭运动训练或常规护理对血液透析患者身体功能和动脉僵硬影响的随机对照初步临床研究。
3 个肾脏单位的 70 名血液透析患者。
血液透析内运动患者每周进行 3 次,在自行车测力计上训练 6 个月,家庭运动患者遵循步行计划以达到相同的每周体力活动量。常规护理患者未接受任何特定干预。
6 个月时,6 分钟步行测试距离和主动脉脉搏波速度的变化在血液透析内运动组(增加 14%)、家庭运动组(增加 11%)和常规护理组(增加 5%)之间无显著差异。次要结局指标包括增强指数(增强压占中心脉搏压的百分比)、外周(肱动脉)和中心血压(使用桡动脉张力测定法无创测量)、体力活动和自我报告的身体功能。在基线和 6 个月时进行测量。
本研究中血管参数分析受到缺乏药物数据的限制。
血液透析内或家庭运动训练与常规护理在身体功能或血管参数方面均无差异。