Kouidi Evangelia J, Grekas Dimitrios M, Deligiannis Asterios P
Laboratory of Sports Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Sep;54(3):511-21. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
Noninvasive screening studies may identify hemodialysis (HD) patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Interventions that improve the findings of such screening studies may reduce sudden cardiac death.
Randomized and controlled clinical trial.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 59 HD patients were randomly assigned to an exercise training group (group A; 30 patients) or control group (group B; 29 patients).
Group A participated in a 10-month supervised exercise training program during the HD sessions (3 times weekly).
Each risk factor separately and the composite risk score. Patients were considered high risk according to the criteria (aerobic capacity: peak oxygen consumption [Vo(2)peak] < or = 14 mL/kg/min, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30%, SD of normal RR intervals [SDNN] < or = 70 milliseconds, positive T-wave alternans, or positive late potentials). Statistical analysis included a 2-group comparison of change scores and analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline.
At entry and end of the study, Vo(2)peak and left ventricular ejection fraction were estimated, heart rate variability was calculated (measurement of SDNN, mean RR intervals), and the ratio between low- (LF) to high-frequency (HF) components (LF/HF) and late potentials and T-wave alternans were detected.
Baseline measurements were similar between the 2 groups. At follow-up, 9 patients from group A and 20 from group B (P = 0.003) were considered high risk. The change in number of risk markers over time was significantly different between groups (-0.5 +/- 0.7 in group A versus 0.07 +/- 0.3 in group B; P < 0.001). Additionally, the change in Vo(2)peak over time was 3.5 +/- 3.2 in group A and -0.2 +/- 3.5 mL/kg/min in group B (P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fractions were 3.4% +/- 3.9% and 0.2% +/- 7.7% (P < 0.05), SDNNs were 12.6 +/- 16.3 and -1.1 +/- 10.2 milliseconds (P < 0.001), and LF/HF ratios were 0.3 +/- 0.4 and -0.1 +/- 0.3 (P < 0.001), respectively. Change in numerical score of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram also was found to be statistically different (P < 0.05) between groups.
Clinical outcomes, including survival, were not assessed.
Exercise training improves aerobic capacity and ameliorates some indicators of risk of sudden cardiac death in HD patients.
非侵入性筛查研究可能会识别出心脏性猝死风险增加的血液透析(HD)患者。改善此类筛查研究结果的干预措施可能会降低心脏性猝死的发生率。
随机对照临床试验。
59例HD患者被随机分为运动训练组(A组;30例患者)或对照组(B组;29例患者)。
A组在HD治疗期间(每周3次)参加为期10个月的有监督的运动训练项目。
分别观察每个风险因素以及综合风险评分。根据以下标准将患者视为高危患者(有氧运动能力:峰值耗氧量[Vo(2)peak]≤14 mL/kg/min、左心室射血分数≤30%、正常RR间期标准差[SDNN]≤70毫秒、T波交替阳性或晚电位阳性)。统计分析包括两组变化分数的比较以及对基线进行校正的协方差分析。
在研究开始时和结束时,评估Vo(2)peak和左心室射血分数,计算心率变异性(测量SDNN、平均RR间期),检测低频(LF)与高频(HF)成分的比值(LF/HF)以及晚电位和T波交替。
两组的基线测量值相似。随访时,A组有9例患者、B组有20例患者被视为高危患者(P = 0.003)。两组之间随时间变化的风险标志物数量差异有统计学意义(A组为-0.5±0.7,B组为0.07±0.3;P < 0.001)。此外,随时间变化的Vo(2)peak在A组为3.5±3.2,在B组为-0.2±3.5 mL/kg/min(P < 0.001),左心室射血分数分别为3.4%±3.9%和0.2%±7.7%(P < 0.05),SDNN分别为12.6±16.3和-1.1±10.2毫秒(P < 0.001),LF/HF比值分别为0.3±0.4和-0.1±0.3(P < 0.001)。两组之间信号平均心电图数值评分的变化也有统计学差异(P < 0.05)。
未评估包括生存率在内的临床结局。
运动训练可提高HD患者的有氧运动能力,并改善一些心脏性猝死风险指标。