Suppr超能文献

苔藓样糠疹和假性斑秃通过微阵列涉及不同的疾病相关基因表达模式。

Lichen planopilaris and pseudopelade of Brocq involve distinct disease associated gene expression patterns by microarray.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Dermatol Sci. 2010 Jan;57(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and pseudopelade of Brocq (PPB) are two scarring alopecia diagnoses that exhibit similar clinical features. Some suggest LPP and PPB are not distinct diseases, but rather different clinical presentations in a spectrum derived from the same underlying pathogenic mechanism.

OBJECTIVE

We explored the degree of similarity between LPP and PPB gene expression patterns and the potential for common and unique gene pathway and gene activity in LPP and PPB using microarrays.

METHODS

Microarray analysis, using a 21K cDNA set, was performed on pairs of biopsies obtained from affected and unaffected scalp of untreated patients. Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Significantly differentially expressed genes were identified by analysis of microarray results in various datasets and screened for signaling pathway involvement. Selected genes were validated by quantitative PCR and immunohistology.

RESULTS

The global gene expression profiles in LPP and PPB versus comparative intra-control scalp tissue were distinguishable by significance analysis of microarrays (SAM). There was limited commonality in the gene expression profiles between LPP and PPB. Specific genes, such as MMP11, TNFSF13B, and APOL2, were identified with significantly differential expression in association with LPP versus PPB.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may have important implications for understanding the pathogenesis of LPP and PPB at the molecular level. Results suggest LPP and PPB involve different mechanisms of disease development and should be regarded as biologically distinct cicatricial alopecia diagnoses. Genes that we have identified may be useful as markers of the respective diagnoses and may be potential therapeutic targets.

摘要

背景

扁平苔藓样瘢痕性脱发(LPP)和假性斑秃(PPB)是两种具有相似临床特征的瘢痕性脱发诊断。一些人认为 LPP 和 PPB 不是两种不同的疾病,而是由同一潜在致病机制衍生的不同临床表现。

目的

我们使用微阵列探索 LPP 和 PPB 基因表达模式之间的相似程度,以及 LPP 和 PPB 中共同和独特的基因途径和基因活性的可能性。

方法

对未经治疗的患者受累和未受累头皮的活检标本进行微阵列分析,使用 21K cDNA 集。通过组织病理学确认诊断。通过对各种数据集的微阵列结果进行分析,确定显著差异表达的基因,并筛选信号通路参与情况。选择的基因通过定量 PCR 和免疫组织化学进行验证。

结果

LPP 和 PPB 与对照头皮组织相比的全局基因表达谱可通过微阵列差异分析(SAM)区分。LPP 和 PPB 之间的基因表达谱存在有限的共性。与 LPP 相比,与 PPB 相关的特定基因,如 MMP11、TNFSF13B 和 APOL2,具有显著差异表达。

结论

我们的发现可能对理解 LPP 和 PPB 的分子发病机制具有重要意义。结果表明,LPP 和 PPB 涉及不同的疾病发展机制,应被视为生物学上不同的瘢痕性脱发诊断。我们鉴定的基因可能作为各自诊断的标志物有用,并可能成为潜在的治疗靶点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验