Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗与雷珠单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的短期疗效。

Short-term effectiveness of intravitreal bevacizumab versus ranibizumab injections for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

机构信息

Retina Institute of California, Pasadena, California 91105,

出版信息

Retina. 2009 Oct;29(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181b20eed.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of three consecutive intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) in patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study of qualifying consecutively treated patients (n = 176) with new-onset subfoveal choroidal neovascularization presenting at 6 retina referral centers. Patients were treated with 3 consecutive monthly injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or 3 injections of bevacizumab every 6 weeks (1.25 mg) as determined by physician and patient preference. Ophthalmologic evaluations included monthly visual acuity measurements, ocular examinations, and optical coherence tomography imaging at each visit.

RESULTS

A 29.2% reduction in the mean central foveal thickness measurement through optical coherence tomography was found in the ranibizumab-treated patients versus a 20.9% reduction in the bevacizumab-treated patients (P <or= 0.02). Fifty-three percent of ranibizumab-treated patients had returned to a central foveal thickness of <200 microm by the completion of 3 injections compared with 35% of patients treated with bevacizumab (P <or= 0.07). No ocular or systemic adverse events were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

Short-term effectiveness of ranibizumab treatment, as measured by incremental improvement in optical coherence tomography parameters, was significantly greater than bevacizumab treatment, suggesting that there is a difference in the biologic activities of ranibizumab and bevacizumab.

摘要

目的

比较三种连续玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(阿瓦斯汀)和雷珠单抗(Lucentis)治疗初治新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性比较研究,纳入了 6 家视网膜转诊中心连续治疗的新发病例(n=176)伴有黄斑下脉络膜新生血管。根据医生和患者的偏好,患者接受 3 次连续每月注射雷珠单抗(0.5mg)或 3 次每 6 周注射贝伐单抗(1.25mg)。眼科评估包括每次就诊时的每月视力测量、眼部检查和光学相干断层扫描成像。

结果

雷珠单抗治疗组的平均中心黄斑厚度测量值通过光学相干断层扫描降低了 29.2%,而贝伐单抗治疗组降低了 20.9%(P≤0.02)。在完成 3 次注射后,53%的雷珠单抗治疗组患者的中心黄斑厚度恢复到<200μm,而贝伐单抗治疗组为 35%(P≤0.07)。两组均未报告眼部或全身不良反应。

结论

以光学相干断层扫描参数的增量改善来衡量,雷珠单抗治疗的短期疗效明显优于贝伐单抗治疗,提示雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗的生物学活性存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验