Suppr超能文献

身体姿势对主动和被动运动期间本体感觉的影响。

Effect of body orientation on proprioception during active and passive motions.

作者信息

Niessen Martijn H M, Veeger Dirkjan H E J, Janssen Thomas W J

机构信息

Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;88(12):979-85. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c1eac1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether passive and active reproduction of joint position, as well as detection of passive motion (as measures of a subject's proprioception) of the shoulder differ while sitting compared with lying supine.

DESIGN

Shoulder proprioception of 28 healthy subjects (age, 22.2 +/- 1.7 yrs, 15 men) was tested. To test proprioception, angular motion (in degrees) for threshold to detection of passive motion and absolute matching error (in degrees) for passive and active reproduction of joint position were measured using an isokinetic dynamometer. As a measure of consistency, the standard deviation per subject and test (threshold to detection of passive motion and passive and active reproduction of joint position) was measured over three trials. The test scores during sitting and lying supine were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

No effect of body orientation on threshold to detection of passive motion and passive and active reproduction of joint position scores was found. Significantly larger errors were found during active reproduction of joint position compared with passive reproduction of joint position (F = 58.5; P < 0.01), and subjects were also significantly less accurate during active reproduction of joint position (F = 30.1; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Body orientation does not significantly influence proprioceptive errors or consistency, whereas movement mode (active or passive) does. The significance of these findings is that, depending on the situation or the patient's ability, proprioception tests can be conducted while they are lying or sitting, but movement modes cannot be used interchangeably.

摘要

目的

研究与仰卧位相比,坐位时关节位置的被动和主动再现以及肩部被动运动检测(作为受试者本体感觉的指标)是否存在差异。

设计

对28名健康受试者(年龄22.2±1.7岁,15名男性)的肩部本体感觉进行测试。为测试本体感觉,使用等速测力计测量被动运动检测阈值的角运动(度数)以及关节位置被动和主动再现的绝对匹配误差(度数)。作为一致性的指标,在三次试验中测量每个受试者和测试(被动运动检测阈值以及关节位置的被动和主动再现)的标准差。使用重复测量方差分析比较坐位和仰卧位时的测试分数。

结果

未发现身体姿势对被动运动检测阈值以及关节位置被动和主动再现分数有影响。与关节位置的被动再现相比,关节位置主动再现时发现的误差明显更大(F = 58.5;P < 0.01),并且受试者在关节位置主动再现时的准确性也明显更低(F = 30.1;P < 0.01)。

结论

身体姿势不会显著影响本体感觉误差或一致性,而运动模式(主动或被动)则会。这些发现的意义在于,根据具体情况或患者的能力,本体感觉测试可以在卧位或坐位时进行,但运动模式不能互换使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验