Paiva Carlos Eduardo, Paiva Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro, Garita Rodrigo, Michelin Odair Carlito, Okoshi Katashi
Oncological and Hemato-Oncological Center, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2009;40(3-4):133-7. doi: 10.1007/s12029-009-9101-z.
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the backbone of colorectal cancer (CRC) systemic therapy since the great majority of recommended regimens include its administration. A clinical picture consisting of chest pain, sometimes cardiac enzyme elevation, electrocardiogram abnormalities consistent with myocardial ischemia, and normal coronary angiogram associated with 5-FU administration have been infrequently reported. The clinical dilemma is: which chemotherapy regimen should we use in CRC patients with a previous acute coronary syndrome (ACS) associated with 5-FU?
We describe the case of a 55-year-old otherwise healthy woman with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma who presented an ACS probably secondary to arterial vasospasm while receiving continuous intravenous 5-FU infusion (mFOLFOX6 regimen). After the ACS, the patient was treated with raltitrexate plus oxaliplatin (TOMOX) and subsequently with irinotecan plus cetuximab with no other cardiac event.
The risk of cardiotoxicity associated with 5-FU is low but real. The probable mechanism is arterial vasospasm, as suggested by our case report. Both the use of the TOMOX regimen and irinotecan plus cetuximab seems to be safe regimens to be considered in this clinical scenario.
5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)被认为是结直肠癌(CRC)全身治疗的基础,因为绝大多数推荐方案都包括使用它。由胸痛、有时伴有心肌酶升高、与心肌缺血一致的心电图异常以及与5-FU使用相关的冠状动脉造影正常所组成的临床症状鲜有报道。临床难题在于:对于既往有与5-FU相关的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的CRC患者,我们应该使用哪种化疗方案?
我们描述了一名55岁、其他方面健康的转移性结肠腺癌女性患者的病例,该患者在接受持续静脉输注5-FU(mFOLFOX6方案)时出现了可能继发于动脉血管痉挛的ACS。ACS发生后,患者接受了雷替曲塞加奥沙利铂(TOMOX)治疗,随后接受了伊立替康加西妥昔单抗治疗,未再发生其他心脏事件。
与5-FU相关的心脏毒性风险虽低但确实存在。如我们的病例报告所示,可能的机制是动脉血管痉挛。在这种临床情况下,TOMOX方案以及伊立替康加西妥昔单抗的使用似乎都是可考虑的安全方案。