• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物训练课程中解释性展示与仅陈述事实展示之间知识获取的比较分析:一项探索性研究。

Comparative analysis of knowledge gain between interpretive and fact-only presentations at an animal training session: an exploratory study.

作者信息

Visscher Nick C, Snider Richard, Vander Stoep Gail

机构信息

Zoology Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Zoo Biol. 2009 Sep;28(5):488-95. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20174.

DOI:10.1002/zoo.20174
PMID:19937701
Abstract

Zoos and aquariums have recognized the importance of integrating living collections with personally delivered interpretation. One way for zoos to accomplish this is by conducting public animal training sessions accompanied by personal interpretation. Many institutions offer these types of interactions, but the term "interpretation" is used loosely and without clear definition. This exploratory study compared knowledge gain of individual students in three different fifth grade school groups visiting the Potter Park Zoo in Lansing, Michigan. Each group observed an animal training session, with two groups receiving two types of presentations and one group serving as a control group. Although hearing the same facts, the two treatment groups received different program types: an interpretive presentation and a fact-only presentation. The third group viewed the training session but received no presentation. Results showed that individuals who received the interpretive presentation retained more information immediately after the training session than individuals in either of the other two groups. This exploratory study suggests that using an interpretive presentation style is more effective in producing knowledge gain than fact-only presentations in informal learning environments such as zoos and aquariums.

摘要

动物园和水族馆已经认识到将活体动物展示与亲自讲解相结合的重要性。动物园实现这一目标的一种方式是举办有亲自讲解相伴的公众动物训练活动。许多机构都提供这类互动活动,但“讲解”一词的使用较为随意,且没有明确的定义。这项探索性研究比较了密歇根州兰辛市波特公园动物园接待的三个不同五年级学生团体中个体学生的知识获取情况。每个团体都观看了一场动物训练活动,其中两个团体接受了两种不同类型的讲解,一个团体作为对照组。尽管听到的是相同的事实,但两个实验组接受了不同类型的讲解:一种是有解说的讲解,另一种是只讲事实的讲解。第三组观看了训练活动,但没有接受讲解。结果显示,接受有解说讲解的个体在训练活动结束后比其他两组中的任何一组都能记住更多信息。这项探索性研究表明,在动物园和水族馆等非正式学习环境中,采用有解说的讲解方式比只讲事实的讲解方式在促进知识获取方面更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of knowledge gain between interpretive and fact-only presentations at an animal training session: an exploratory study.动物训练课程中解释性展示与仅陈述事实展示之间知识获取的比较分析:一项探索性研究。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Sep;28(5):488-95. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20174.
2
Zoo experiences: conversations, connections, and concern for animals.动物园体验:对话、联系与对动物的关怀。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Sep;28(5):377-97. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20186.
3
Measuring a professional conservation education training program for zoos and wildlife parks in China.衡量中国动物园和野生动物园专业保护教育培训项目。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Sep;28(5):447-61. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20210.
4
Training public school teachers in population dynamics: An evaluation of the urban life-population education workshops in Baltimore.对公立学校教师进行人口动态培训:巴尔的摩城市生活-人口教育工作坊评估
J Sch Health. 1976 Jun;46(6):357-60.
5
Factors facilitating research: a survey of zoo and aquarium professionals.促进研究的因素:对动物园和水族馆专业人员的一项调查。
Zoo Biol. 2010 Nov-Dec;29(6):663-75. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20306.
6
Benefits and costs of Channel One in a middle school setting and the role of media-literacy training.第一频道在中学环境中的利弊及媒介素养培训的作用。
Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):e423-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0953.
7
Zoo theater's influence on affect and cognition: a case study from the Central Park Zoo in New York.动物园剧场对情感和认知的影响:来自纽约中央公园动物园的案例研究。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Sep;28(5):412-28. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20201.
8
Students' and teachers' perceived and actual verbal interactions in seminar groups.学生和教师在研讨小组中所感知到的以及实际发生的言语互动。
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):368-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03301.x.
9
Computer based safety training: an investigation of methods.基于计算机的安全培训:方法研究
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Apr;62(4):257-62. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015958.
10
The educational claims of zoos: where do we go from here?动物园的教育诉求:我们该何去何从?
Zoo Biol. 2013 Jan-Feb;32(1):13-8. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21025. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the effect of visiting zoos and aquariums on visitors' conservation knowledge, beliefs, and behavior.一项关于参观动物园和水族馆对游客保护知识、信念及行为影响的荟萃分析。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Feb;39(1):e14237. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14237. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
2
What Is the Zoo Experience? How Zoos Impact a Visitor's Behaviors, Perceptions, and Conservation Efforts.什么是动物园体验?动物园如何影响游客的行为、认知及保护行动。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01746. eCollection 2019.
3
Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo-based educational campaign: 'Don't Palm Us Off' for orang-utan conservation.
评估一项基于动物园的创新教育活动的保护影响:针对猩猩保护的“别敷衍我们”活动。
Zoo Biol. 2014 May-Jun;33(3):184-96. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21120. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
4
Evidence of public engagement with science: visitor learning at a zoo-housed primate research centre.公众参与科学的证据:动物园圈养灵长类研究中心的访客学习。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044680. Epub 2012 Sep 13.