• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用股血管闭合装置后的长期临床结果。

Long term clinical outcomes after deployment of femoral vascular closure devices in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 15;75(3):345-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22294.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22294
PMID:19937775
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the long term clinical outcomes of femoral vascular closure devices following its deployment in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures.

METHODS

From June 2000 to September 2004, 265 patients who received femoral vascular closure devices after coronary angiography and PCIs were enrolled into the study. Patients' medical records were reviewed and vascular complications within 1 year of follow-up period were recorded. Rutherford's categories of claudication were used to quantify different degrees of claudication and leg ischaemia. Duplex ultrasonography of both femoral arteries (using the nonaccessed site as control) was performed at 1 year after deployment of vascular closure devices. Vessel diameter and flow velocities for both common femoral arteries were obtained.

RESULTS

There was no occurrence of late vascular complications like arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, surgical repair of access site complications, late groin bleeding and infection. By Rutherford categories of claudication, 99.2% of patients had grade 0 claudication while the remaining 0.8% was in grade 1. By arterial Duplex ultrasonography, the peak systolic velocity of the accessed femoral artery (predominantly right side) was nonsignificantly higher, 94.9 + or - 26.0 cm/s when compared to 91.5 + or - 24.8 cm/s in the control site (P = 0.12). As for vessel diameter, no significant difference was found in the mean end-diastolic vessel diameter 8.8 + or - 1.3 mm (puncture site) versus 8.7 + or - 4.4 mm (control site) (P = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

We found that the use of femoral closure devices was safe and it was not associated with any adverse long term vascular complications.

摘要

背景

我们评估了在冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后使用股血管闭合装置的长期临床结果。

方法

2000 年 6 月至 2004 年 9 月,对 265 例在冠状动脉造影和 PCI 后接受股血管闭合装置治疗的患者进行了研究。回顾患者的病历记录,并记录随访期内 1 年内的血管并发症。采用 Rutherford 跛行分类标准来量化不同程度的跛行和腿部缺血。在股血管闭合装置植入 1 年后,对双侧股动脉(使用未穿刺部位作为对照)进行双功超声检查。获得双侧股总动脉的血管直径和血流速度。

结果

无晚期血管并发症发生,如动静脉瘘、假性动脉瘤、血管穿刺部位并发症的手术修复、迟发性腹股沟出血和感染。根据 Rutherford 跛行分类标准,99.2%的患者跛行程度为 0 级,其余 0.8%为 1 级。经动脉双功超声检查,股动脉(主要为右侧)收缩期峰值流速为 94.9 ± 26.0cm/s,与对照组的 91.5 ± 24.8cm/s 相比无显著差异(P = 0.12)。对于血管直径,在平均舒张末期血管直径 8.8 ± 1.3mm(穿刺部位)与 8.7 ± 4.4mm(对照组)之间未发现显著差异(P = 0.72)。

结论

我们发现使用股血管闭合装置是安全的,它与任何不良的长期血管并发症无关。

相似文献

1
Long term clinical outcomes after deployment of femoral vascular closure devices in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用股血管闭合装置后的长期临床结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 15;75(3):345-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22294.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes after deployment of femoral vascular closure devices in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational single-centre registry follow-up.冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用股动脉血管闭合装置后的长期临床结局:一项单中心观察性登记随访研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 12;4(6):e005126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005126.
3
Practices and complications of vascular closure devices and manual compression in patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary procedures.择期经股冠状动脉介入治疗患者中血管闭合装置和手动压迫的实践和并发症。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 15;110(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.065. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
4
Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.一项比较血管闭合装置与手动压迫在诊断性冠状动脉造影术后实现止血效果的随机临床试验的原理与设计:动脉穿刺部位器械封闭 - 闭合装置与手动压迫(ISAR-CLOSURE)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):198-203. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A33.
5
Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices.经皮冠状动脉介入术后股动脉穿刺管理:手动压迫与两种不同血管闭合装置的临床结局及患者满意度比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2001 May;13(5):354-62.
6
[Vascular complications at the femoral access: impact of the percutaneous closure device Perclose].[股动脉穿刺部位的血管并发症:Perclose经皮闭合装置的影响]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2014 Apr;63(2):71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
The safety and efficacy of the StarClose Vascular Closure System: the ultrasound substudy of the CLIP study.StarClose血管闭合系统的安全性和有效性:CLIP研究的超声子研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):684-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20898.
8
Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.使用与穿刺高度相关的血管闭合装置后动脉穿刺部位并发症
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0484-7.
9
Comparison of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with vs. without severe peripheral artery disease.患有与未患有严重外周动脉疾病的患者使用基于胶原蛋白的血管闭合装置的比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Feb;21(1):79-84. doi: 10.1583/13-4401MR.1.
10
Femoral angiogram prior to arteriotomy closure device does not reduce vascular complications in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.在使用动脉切开闭合装置之前进行股动脉血管造影并不能降低接受心脏导管插入术患者的血管并发症发生率。
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Apr;21(2):204-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00342.x. Epub 2008 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-closure of Large-Sized Arterial Access Sites in Adults Undergoing Transcatheter Structural Interventions.接受经导管结构性介入治疗的成人大型动脉入路部位的预闭合
Cardiol Ther. 2015 Jun;4(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/s40119-014-0034-7. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes after deployment of femoral vascular closure devices in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational single-centre registry follow-up.冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用股动脉血管闭合装置后的长期临床结局:一项单中心观察性登记随访研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 12;4(6):e005126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005126.