Transporters--the view from industry.

The involvement of transport proteins in the disposition of drugs is receiving much attention of the scientific community. Recently, researchers from academia have surmised that drug transport rather than passive diffusion is the regular mechanism for molecules to cross cell membranes. On bare face value, however, sound evidence of the impact of transport proteins on clinical pharmacokinetics has been a trickle rather than a stream of convincing studies during the last decade, in stark contrast to the number of in vitro studies published. Progress in this area may have been impeded by a number of factors. Only a limited number of small-molecule drugs fall within the physicochemical property space (i.e., high hydrophilicity and low passive permeability) that makes them predestined as transport protein substrates without other pharmacokinetic processes (e.g., passive diffusion, metabolism, nonspecific binding to tissue proteins) blurring the picture. The vast majority of drug molecules are lipophilic enough to be amenable to passive diffusion across cell membranes and to undergo metabolism to some extent. In these cases, clinical evidence relies heavily on the observation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions not readily explained by the interference with drug metabolizing enzymes. Given the circumstances outlined above, it is not surprising that, based upon clinical observations, the final assessment as to the overall relevance of drug transport for clinical pharmacokinetics is still pending.