Spangler B D
Biological and Medical Research Division, Argonne National Laboratory, IL 60439-4833.
J Immunol. 1991 Mar 1;146(5):1591-5.
mAb raised against synthetic peptides derived from cholera toxin, myohemerythrin, and sickle hemoglobin were analyzed by both solid-phase and solution-phase methods. Antipeptide mAb against cholera toxin (mAb TE32 and TE33), against myohemerythrin (mAb B13I2, B13C2, and B13F2), and against sickle hemoglobin (mAb HuS-1 and HuS-2), had been previously described and used for vaccine development, structural characterization, or identification of a specific antigenic determinant, and each was apparently capable of binding both peptide and native Ag. In this study, all were found to bind whole protein when tested against immobilized Ag in a standard solid-phase assay (ELISA), yet none of the antibodies recognized the Ag in its true native form, failing to bind when tested in several solution-phase assay systems, including size exclusion HPLC. This discrepancy may be the result of modifications of the epitope created by interaction and possible denaturation of the protein on the solid-phase matrix. As a consequence, binding of these antibodies to peptides, either immobilized or in solution, or to immobilized protein, cannot be used to infer that the peptide has assumed a conformation that corresponds to that of the cognate sequence in the native protein. A re-evaluation of binding data that relates antipeptide mAb to native structural characteristics may be necessary.
采用固相和液相方法分析了针对源自霍乱毒素、肌红蛋白和镰状血红蛋白的合成肽产生的单克隆抗体。之前已经描述过针对霍乱毒素的抗肽单克隆抗体(单克隆抗体TE32和TE33)、针对肌红蛋白的抗肽单克隆抗体(单克隆抗体B13I2、B13C2和B13F2)以及针对镰状血红蛋白的抗肽单克隆抗体(单克隆抗体HuS-1和HuS-2),它们已被用于疫苗开发、结构表征或特定抗原决定簇的鉴定,并且每一种显然都能够结合肽和天然抗原。在本研究中,当在标准固相分析(酶联免疫吸附测定)中针对固定化抗原进行测试时,发现所有这些抗体都能结合完整蛋白质,然而在包括尺寸排阻高效液相色谱在内的几种液相分析系统中进行测试时,没有一种抗体能识别其真正的天然形式的抗原,无法结合。这种差异可能是由于固相基质上蛋白质相互作用和可能的变性导致表位修饰的结果。因此,这些抗体与固定化或溶液中的肽或与固定化蛋白质的结合,不能用于推断该肽已呈现出与天然蛋白质中同源序列相对应的构象。可能需要重新评估将抗肽单克隆抗体与天然结构特征相关联的结合数据。